<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sports betting blog &#187; Handicaps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/tag/handicaps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk</link>
	<description>sports betting blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Follow The Flag To The Payout Counter</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/follow-the-flag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/follow-the-flag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 12:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flag 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lingfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistical Tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=1331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our usual Saturday installment from Guy at www.mathematician-betting.co.uk
Can he make it three profitable Saturday&#8217;s in a row?
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;
Weather affected day and It&#8217;s Southwell that has
the most coverage as the only card that was safe.
I&#8217;m surprised an 11f handicap produces my best bet but
the 2.55pm may be best left to FOLLOW THE FLAG
a horse I have being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our usual Saturday installment from Guy at <a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk" target="_blank">www.mathematician-betting.co.uk</a></p>
<p>Can he make it three profitable Saturday&#8217;s in a row?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Weather affected day and It&#8217;s Southwell that has<br />
the most coverage as the only card that was safe.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised an 11f handicap produces my best bet but<br />
the 2.55pm may be best left to FOLLOW THE FLAG<br />
a horse I have being saying for a while was well treated<br />
and looking at his last run I think he needs this distance.<br />
Decided against putting him up as a bet because I know<br />
my angles in 11f handicaps are awkward and messy and<br />
there is every chance a non runner killed my each way<br />
options. I do see FOLLOW THE FLAG as my best bet.</p>
<p>S o u t h w e l l   2.55</p>
<p>7/2 Royal Swain, 7/2 Stanley Rigby, 9/2 Sail Home<br />
6/1 Ostentation, 6/1 Rajamand, 10/1 Follow The Flag<br />
10/1 Hits Only Jude, 12/1 Magic Echo.</p>
<p>This is an 11f Handicap for 0-75 rated horses. This is a<br />
nightmare distance to sort out statistically as I have said<br />
countless times before. I have few 11f races to work with<br />
but I ran all these horses through some statistical tests to get a shortlist.<br />
The horses with long absences struggled a bit and fell short.<br />
So did the horses that were well beaten over 12f last time.<br />
There are stamina doubts to consider with horses like HITS ONLY JUDE.<br />
In the end I felt the most promising profiles were both FOLLOW THE FLAG<br />
and SAIL HOME and whilst neither looked brilliant I can at least find a winner<br />
like both which is a reasonable start. I have flagged up FOLLOW THE FLAG 4<br />
times recently as well handicapped and he may well be able to win over this distance.<br />
He appeals most with Sail Home the horse I fear the most. I could have SAIL HOME<br />
as the saver in the race but I&#8217;d rather bet FOLLOW THE FLAG E/W as<br />
I think he looked like he was crying out for a slower and<br />
longer surface last time at Lingfield. He only just coped<br />
with a faster track at a Mile but stayed on very well late<br />
in the race and I think he could well take this race today.</p>
<p>Selection</p>
<p>FOLLOW THE FLAG 11/2 <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=33' title='Ladbrokes' target="_blank">Ladbrokes</a> &#8211; Sporting Bet  Each Way</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/follow-the-flag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free Racing Tip For Newmarket</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/free-racing-tip-for-newmarket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/free-racing-tip-for-newmarket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltimore Clipper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bet365]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fillies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Horse Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free horse racing tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newmarket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Hill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=1177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I normally push hard on Saturday and do an expansive
message with a large number of previews. I&#8217;m taking it
much slower today. I&#8217;ve reduced the previews today to
only ten for Full members and I haven&#8217;t pushed that hard
on the analysis.
We had a nice winner on the free horse betting blog
last Saturday with an easy win for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I normally push hard on Saturday and do an expansive<br />
message with a large number of previews. I&#8217;m taking it<br />
much slower today. I&#8217;ve reduced the previews today to<br />
only ten for Full members and I haven&#8217;t pushed that hard<br />
on the analysis.</p>
<p>We had a nice winner on the free horse betting blog<br />
last Saturday with an easy win for Baltimore Clipper<br />
advised here at 9/1</p>
<p>Anyhow onto today&#8217;s racing tip.</p>
<p>N e w m a r k e t   2.50</p>
<p>5/1 Roger Sez, 11/2 Piranha, 6/1 Mention<br />
7/1 Imelda Mayhem, 7/1 Nearly A Gift, 15/2 Ballyea<br />
8/1 Correct, 9/1 My Lucky Liz, 16/1 Judas Jo<br />
20/1 Redair, 25/1 Princess Banu.</p>
<p>This is a Fillies Nursery over 6f. There are only 3 of these races in July and August all being the renewals of this race so nothing much to help us with here. I will list my trends from these three races. I can tell you now that No horses pass all 6 or my trends so we wont have an ideal type here.</p>
<p>* All 3 winners had 4-5-6 career starts<br />
* All 3 winners ran within 2 weeks<br />
* All 3 winners had form in Class 2 and no higher<br />
* All 3 winners were beaten last time out<br />
* All 3 winners ran within 10 lengths of the winner last time<br />
* None of the 3 winners came from Handicaps</p>
<p>MENTION passes all stats except one and I find it interesting he comes from Newbury and the 5f Super Sprint. Two of the  Three past winners did exactly the same. I think she looks a well treated horse off 80. She will appreciate the 6f. She was drawn in the wrong place at Newbury and was murdered later on in the race when badly hampered and that cost her several places. I think she has an outstanding chance of winning this. My danger would be MY LUCKY LIZ</p>
<p>Selection &#8211; MENTION</p>
<p>7/1 at <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=67' title='Coral' target="_blank">Coral</a> <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=1' title='bet365' target="_blank">Bet365</a> <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=34' title='William Hill' target="_blank">William Hill</a></p>
<p>===============================</p>
<p>This was provided by Guy Ward aka The Mathematician</p>
<p>To visit Guy&#8217;s site click here ==&gt;  <strong><a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk/free-horse-racing-tips.asp" target="_blank">Free Horse Racing Tips</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/free-racing-tip-for-newmarket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Horse Racing Stats For Saturday</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/horse-racing-stats-for-saturday-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/horse-racing-stats-for-saturday-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Age Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favourites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maidens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nurseries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=1170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COURSE FAVOURITE STATS FLAT &#8211; this is a section looking at the stats for favourites at courses in certain race types
 
Doncaster favourites



Race type
Wins
Bets
SR (%)
Profit
ROI (%)
Race Times


2yo maidens
20
68
29.4
-£16.89
-24.8
2.10


3yo handicaps
11
58
19.0
-£19.35
-33.4
3.20, 5.05


3yo+/4yo+ handicaps
59
244
24.2
-£14.29
-5.9
3.55


3yo+ maidens
6
22
27.3
-£10.25
-46.6
4.25



Goodwood favourites



Race type
Wins
Bets
SR (%)
Profit
ROI (%)
Race Times


2yo maidens
33
104
31.7
-£9.39
-9.0
4.20


3yo+/4yo+ handicaps
70
331
21.2
-£50.06
-15.1
2.05, 2.35, 3.45, 5.35



Hamilton favourites



Race type
Wins
Bets
SR (%)
Profit
ROI (%)
Race Times


3yo+/4yo+ handicaps
71
301
23.6
-£60.33
-20.0
7.10, 7.40, 8.10, 9.10


3yo+ maidens
12
21
57.1
£6.90
32.9
8.40



Lingfield favourites



Race type
Wins
Bets
SR (%)
Profit
ROI [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>COURSE FAVOURITE STATS FLAT &#8211; </strong>this is a section looking at the stats for favourites at courses in certain race types</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Doncaster</strong><strong> favourites</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="651">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">Race type</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">Wins</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">Bets</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">SR (%)</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">Profit</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">ROI (%)</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">Race Times</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">2yo maidens</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">20</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">68</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">29.4</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-£16.89</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-24.8</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">2.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo handicaps</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">11</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">58</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">19.0</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-£19.35</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-33.4</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3.20, 5.05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo+/4yo+ handicaps</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">59</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">244</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">24.2</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-£14.29</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-5.9</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo+ maidens</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">6</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">22</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">27.3</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-£10.25</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-46.6</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">4.25</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Goodwood favourites</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="651">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">Race type</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">Wins</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">Bets</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">SR (%)</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">Profit</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">ROI (%)</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">Race Times</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">2yo maidens</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">33</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">104</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">31.7</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-£9.39</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-9.0</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">4.20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo+/4yo+ handicaps</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">70</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">331</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">21.2</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-£50.06</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-15.1</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">2.05, 2.35, 3.45, 5.35</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Hamilton</strong><strong> favourites</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="651">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">Race type</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">Wins</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">Bets</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">SR (%)</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">Profit</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">ROI (%)</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">Race Times</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo+/4yo+ handicaps</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">71</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">301</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">23.6</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-£60.33</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-20.0</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">7.10, 7.40, 8.10, 9.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo+ maidens</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">12</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">21</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">57.1</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">£6.90</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">32.9</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">8.40</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Lingfield favourites</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="651">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">Race type</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">Wins</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">Bets</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">SR (%)</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">Profit</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">ROI (%)</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">Race Times</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">2yo maidens</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">38</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">68</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">55.9</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">£16.32</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">24.0</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">6.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo+/4yo+ handicaps</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">55</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">169</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">32.5</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">£28.53</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">16.9</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">5.55, 6.55, 7.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">2yo maidens</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">98</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">266</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">36.8</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-£28.02</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-10.5</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">7.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo+/4yo+ handicaps</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">362</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">1369</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">26.4</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-£55.15</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-4.0</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">8.25</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Newmarket</strong><strong> favourites</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="651">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">Race type</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">Wins</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">Bets</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">SR (%)</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">Profit</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">ROI (%)</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">Race Times</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">2yo maidens</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">89</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">230</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">38.7</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">£18.00</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">7.8</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo handicaps</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">65</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">220</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">29.6</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">£18.38</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">8.4</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">2.20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo+/4yo+ handicaps</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">93</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">445</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">20.9</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-£84.44</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-19.0</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">4.05, 5.15, 5.50</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Thirsk favourites</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="651">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">Race type</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">Wins</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">Bets</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">SR (%)</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">Profit</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">ROI (%)</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">Race Times</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">2yo maidens</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">25</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">63</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">39.7</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">£2.02</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">3.2</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">1.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo handicaps</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">23</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">73</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">31.5</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">£0.40</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">0.5</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3.40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo+/4yo+ handicaps</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">67</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">242</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">27.7</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">£16.73</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">6.9</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">4.10, 4.45, 5.20, 5.45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3yo+ maidens</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">18</td>
<td width="51" valign="bottom">46</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">39.1</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-£9.07</td>
<td width="66" valign="bottom">-19.7</td>
<td width="175" valign="bottom">3.05</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>FAVOURITE STATS &#8211; </strong>this is a section looking at the stats for favourites certain race types. These race types occur less often so the course favourite stats for such races would have fairly small samples &#8211; hence they have been grouped together to give you an overview.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="601">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">Race type</td>
<td width="63" valign="bottom">Wins</td>
<td width="63" valign="bottom">Bets</td>
<td width="63" valign="bottom">SR</td>
<td width="70" valign="bottom">Profit</td>
<td width="55" valign="bottom">ROI</td>
<td width="132" valign="bottom">Race Times</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">2yo nurseries</td>
<td width="63" valign="bottom">249</td>
<td width="63" valign="bottom">922</td>
<td width="63" valign="bottom">27</td>
<td width="70" valign="bottom">-£62.25</td>
<td width="55" valign="bottom">-6.8</td>
<td width="132" valign="bottom">Good 4.55,   Hami 6.40, Newm 2.50, Thir 2.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="156" valign="bottom">All age Group 1 races</td>
<td width="63" valign="bottom">40</td>
<td width="63" valign="bottom">99</td>
<td width="63" valign="bottom">40.4</td>
<td width="70" valign="bottom">+£1.75</td>
<td width="55" valign="bottom">1.8</td>
<td width="132" valign="bottom">Good 3.10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>DRAW SECTION</strong> &#8211; the stats are collated from studying 10+ runner handicaps. Each race is split into three &#8211; a top third of the draw, a middle third of the draw and a bottom third of the draw.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="637">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="215" valign="bottom">Course &amp; distance (time)</td>
<td width="147" valign="bottom">Bottom third win %</td>
<td width="147" valign="bottom">Middle third win%</td>
<td width="129" valign="bottom">Top third win%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Goodwood 6f (2.05, 4.55)</td>
<td valign="bottom">46</td>
<td valign="bottom">40</td>
<td width="129" valign="bottom">14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Goodwood 1m1f (5.35)</td>
<td valign="bottom">20</td>
<td valign="bottom">47</td>
<td width="129" valign="bottom">33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Hamilton 5f (7.10)</td>
<td valign="bottom">24</td>
<td valign="bottom">24</td>
<td width="129" valign="bottom">53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Hamilton 1m (9.10)</td>
<td valign="bottom">45</td>
<td valign="bottom">27</td>
<td width="129" valign="bottom">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Lingfield 7f140yds (5.55)</td>
<td valign="bottom">20</td>
<td valign="bottom">40</td>
<td width="129" valign="bottom">40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Lingfield 6f (7.25)</td>
<td valign="bottom">13</td>
<td valign="bottom">13</td>
<td width="129" valign="bottom">73</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Lingfield aw 1m2f (8.25)</td>
<td valign="bottom">34</td>
<td valign="bottom">29</td>
<td width="129" valign="bottom">37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Thirsk 5f (2.30)</td>
<td valign="bottom">45</td>
<td valign="bottom">15</td>
<td width="129" valign="bottom">40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Thirsk 1m (3.40, 4.10)</td>
<td valign="bottom">32</td>
<td valign="bottom">41</td>
<td width="129" valign="bottom">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Thirsk 6f (5.20)</td>
<td valign="bottom">16</td>
<td valign="bottom">32</td>
<td width="129" valign="bottom">52</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>==================================================</p>
<p>This information was taken from the excellent <a href="http://www.racingtrends.co.uk">RacingTrends Service</a>.</p>
<p>Shown above is actually just a small portion of the Saturday message from RacingTrends. In addition to horse racing statistics RacingTrends also provide long term profitable systematic lays selections which are a bit more akin to a normal tipping service.</p>
<p><strong>HINT: RacingTrends  will on occasion offer a free trial to sports betting blog subscribers. Why not <a href="../wp-login.php?action=register">Register Here for Free</a> so you know when such a deal is available.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/horse-racing-stats-for-saturday-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mathematician Betting Message</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/mathematician-betting-message/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/mathematician-betting-message/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 11:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ascot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betting Uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decent Chance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desert Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good Word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hatred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Showcase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six Months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typical Style]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=1084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A copy of the www.mathematician-betting.co.uk message for today.
This is typical style of Guy&#8217;s daily output for clients there.
As you can see he knows a lot and works very hard.
Quite a few of his clients have been with him not for a month or six months even but for over 5 years !
=====================
No Strong Bet Today
****************************************************
****************************************************
2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A copy of the <a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk">www.mathematician-betting.co.uk</a> message for today.</p>
<p>This is typical style of Guy&#8217;s daily output for clients there.</p>
<p>As you can see he knows a lot and works very hard.</p>
<p>Quite a few of his clients have been with him not for a month or six months even but for over 5 years !</p>
<p>=====================</p>
<p>No Strong Bet Today</p>
<p>****************************************************<br />
****************************************************</p>
<p>2 Bets Today</p>
<p>Lingfield 4.55</p>
<p>SEEK THE FAIR LAND 8/1</p>
<p>Win Bet</p>
<p>Thirsk 6.30</p>
<p>DESERT STRIKE 8/1</p>
<p>Each Way Bet</p>
<p>* No Message Tomorrow *</p>
<p>This is the 11th message in a row without a break and<br />
National Hunt cards tomorrow give me a chance for a<br />
break and as I&#8217;m flagging now and tired it&#8217;s a good time.</p>
<p>Never really liked the cards on this day as there are so<br />
many smaller field conditions races. The evening cards<br />
are not as good as normal as fast ground has reduced a<br />
few of the fields to uncompetetive races. I have decided<br />
to go with two chosen bets on the day and both are big<br />
prices in open handicaps. SEEK THE FAIR LAND has<br />
a decent chance and looks overpriced to me but there&#8217;s<br />
no margin for error in this race and we may need to be<br />
lucky despite a good draw. DESERT STRIKE also has<br />
a reasonable chance. Unusual bet for me as statistically<br />
he is just average but I was given a good word for him<br />
earlier in the week and having watched his last run in<br />
the understanding he wasn&#8217;t fancied last time I liked a<br />
performance that showed he had a lot in hand. Think<br />
he is worth a bet as there are lots of horses I dislike in<br />
this race and there are 4 places available. Worth a bet.</p>
<p>****************************************************<br />
****************************************************</p>
<p>Message Thoughts</p>
<p>Not that many places that I want to go today. I have a<br />
hatred of Ascot and find it beats me more often than it<br />
helps me so nothing there except the Victoria Cup stats<br />
and I am only doing those as its the showcase handicap<br />
of the day. I also hate the Haydock mixed card as usual.</p>
<p>There a lots of races I can&#8217;t get serious in. I dont want<br />
to get dragged into smaller field races. The Maidens or<br />
the trial races , conditions races or the pattern contests<br />
are all unpleasant. I have looked at a few of these from<br />
a safe distance but these rarely throw up stronger bets.</p>
<p>Far too many of those today and not that many suit me<br />
today. It is normally a weak Saturday for us. Only doing<br />
a short portfolio of races I feel I can offer something in.</p>
<p>****************************************************<br />
****************************************************</p>
<p>Friday&#8217;s Summary</p>
<p>One bet and a winner in GALA CASINO STAR which was<br />
welcome after an unsteady few days. Hopefully that was a<br />
sign of things to come. I thought the message was the best<br />
for a while. Seemed to be lots of winners in there.<br />
Overall  a strong message and with quite a lot going our way<br />
it felt like it worked on a day I was forced into summarising more.</p>
<p>****************************************************<br />
****************************************************</p>
<p>P R O F I L E S   &amp;  P R E V I E W S</p>
<p>Nottingham 1.50</p>
<p>9/4 Select Committee, 7/2 Secret Venue, 5/1 Absa Lutte<br />
6/1 Atlantic Beach, 7/1 Black Baccara, 10/1 Bilash<br />
14/1 Micky Mac, 14/1 Yurituni.</p>
<p>Unpleasant 5f Handicap to start with. Weak profiles for the<br />
likes of BILASH and MICKY MAC. I found YURITUNI not<br />
safe enough and unlike any winners. SELECT COMMITTEE<br />
lacks a bit of backclass and because of that I just failed to get him<br />
into safe statistical territory as all similar horses needed 3 runs that year.<br />
I felt the same with SECRET VENUE who&#8217;s younger but has just<br />
1 run this year. I am oppose these horses. I think one of 3 horses should be considered here</p>
<p>* BLACK BACCARA &#8211; Well raced filly with chances<br />
* ABSA LUTTE &#8211; Older Mare but offers enough<br />
* ATLANTIC BEACH &#8211; Solid enough profile</p>
<p>Lingfield 2.10</p>
<p>Seasonal debutants have won the last 6 Chartwell Stakes<br />
but&#8217;s time for a change now. DEVER DREAM is having<br />
her first run but the only winners as experienced as her<br />
had by then achieved Group 1 Class before and she lacks<br />
that. PYRRHA and TROPICAL PARADISE also racing<br />
first time out are a little bit exposed to be doing that so<br />
with all 3 of these badly drawn I expect the winner will<br />
have run this year. No 3 year old that had raced at least<br />
5 times before won with under 2 runs that season which<br />
is a problem for EUCHARIST and no 3yo has won this<br />
coming from 6f like PERFECT TRIBUTE. Overall the<br />
safest choice looks to be FLAMBEAU the favourite.</p>
<p>Lingfield 2.40</p>
<p>100/30 Field Of Miracles, 4/1 Date With Destiny<br />
5/1 Palm Pilot, 6/1 Zain Al Boldan, 7/1 Always The Lady<br />
10/1 Galivant, 12/1 Al Mayasah, 12/1 Saint Helena<br />
20/1 Barathea Dancer.</p>
<p>The Oaks trial looks destined for a horse that&#8217;s ran this<br />
year. No past winners came from 3yo handicaps which<br />
is why I reject ZAIN AL BOLDAN &#8211; SAINT HELENA<br />
and PALM PILOT. The horses winning 10f maidens<br />
all had more experience than ALWAYS THE LADY<br />
and more runs that year. DATE WITH DESTINY is<br />
respected but I think FIELD OFF MIRACLES might<br />
improve past her and she would be my choice.</p>
<p>Nottingham 2.55</p>
<p>9/4 Shernando, 5/2 Hallstatt, 9/2 Bollin Greta<br />
6/1 Emrani, 6/1 Wild Desert, 12/1 Daylami Dreams</p>
<p>This is a 14f Handicap. I looked at 112 similar races at this time of year.<br />
Horses aged 4 coming from 3yo handicaps first time out are 2-22.<br />
However fillies were 2-2 and Males had a 0-20 record and SHERNANDO<br />
fails that as a male. The two winners also had much more experience and less<br />
weight so I am avoiding SHERNANDO. Also out are BOLLIN GRETA<br />
and DAYLAMI DREAMS both older seasonal debutants and not like any of the 112 winners.</p>
<p>These are my negatives.</p>
<p>EMRANI &#8211; Hard to read perhaps didnt do enough last time<br />
WILD DESERT &#8211; Very hard to read but a possible<br />
HALLSTATT &#8211; Limitations but easily the Fittest horse</p>
<p>Lingfield 3.10</p>
<p>The Derby Trial is another messy trials race.<br />
HURRICANE HIGGINS would be my choice.</p>
<p>Ascot 3.25</p>
<p><a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=38' title='Tote' target="_blank">Tote</a>sport Victoria Cup (Handicap) (CLASS 2) (4yo+) 7f</p>
<p>8/1 Horseradish, 10/1 Hawkeyethenoo, 14/1 Al Muheer<br />
14/1 Brae Hill, 14/1 Shamandar, 16/1 Castles In The Air<br />
16/1 Excellent Guest, 16/1 Lowther, 16/1 Nasri, Lutine Bell<br />
20/1 Fathsta, Himalya, 20/1 Mon Cadeaux, 20/1 Zero Money<br />
25/1 Gouray Girl, 25/1 Noble Citizen, 25/1 Sunraider<br />
28/1 Layla´s Hero, 33/1 Advanced, 33/1 Bay Knight<br />
33/1 Bravo Echo, 33/1 Dhaular Dhar, 33/1 Douze Points<br />
33/1 Golden Desert, 33/1 Manassas, 33/1 Oasis Dancer,<br />
33/1 Parisian Pyramid, Rulesn´regulations, Corporal Maddox.</p>
<p>* The Victoria Cup is a 7f Handicap for 0-110 horses<br />
* Since 1990 there has been 18 renewals of this race<br />
* Avoid horses with 3 or more runs that season<br />
* Avoid horses from 5f races<br />
* Oppose horses aged 7 or more (0-46)<br />
* Oppose exposed horses absent 7 weeks or more<br />
* Oppose exposed 6 year olds with 1 run this season<br />
* Oppose exposed horses absent 7 weeks or more<br />
* Avoid fillies who are 0-23 in this race<br />
* Oppose exposed horses from 8f races if 1 run this year<br />
* Oppose exposed horses from 6f or shorter<br />
* Oppose exposed horses beaten 6 + lengths last time<br />
* Avoid any horses from a Conditions race (0-41)<br />
* Avoid 4 year olds with 13 + runs unless with Group 1 form<br />
* Seasonal debutants have a 3-95 record<br />
* All 3 were male aged 4 or 5<br />
* They all came from 7f races and had 7-20 runs<br />
* Horses with 6 or more career wins are 0-71<br />
* Horses with 9st 5lbs or more had a poor 1-73 record<br />
* Horses from 6f races won 4 renewals<br />
* All 3 that did it had 1 run this year<br />
* None that did it ran within 2 weeks (0-29)<br />
* Only 2 past winners ran in Group class before<br />
* None were aged 6 or more<br />
* Those doing that with under 21 career runs were 0-38<br />
* Horses that come from 8f or more won 4 races<br />
* Those that had 13 or more runs doing this were 1-73<br />
* That winner ran within 2 weeks</p>
<p>SHORTLIST</p>
<p>* HORSERADISH &#8211; similar to 1999 winner &#8211; Draws a worry<br />
* ZERO MONEY &#8211; Statistically fine if he is fit enough<br />
* BRAE HILL &#8211; Acceptable profile</p>
<p>Nottingham 3.30</p>
<p>Hard race and I couldnt sort it.<br />
BOUNTY BOX &#8211; Dont like the profile much<br />
BEYOND DESIRE &#8211; Definate chance<br />
KHOR SHEED &#8211; Acceptable<br />
ANNE OF KIEV &#8211; Unmatchable but interesting<br />
There is one bet that I see worth having if playing<br />
ANNE OF KIEV as a Place Only Bet at evens</p>
<p>Haydock 3.40</p>
<p>6/1 Remember Now, 10/1 Knight In Purple<br />
10/1 Tatispout, 12/1 Ballybriggan, 12/1 Higgy´s Ragazzo<br />
12/1 Pires, 12/1 Rebel Dancer, 14/1 Jubail, 16/1 Eradicate<br />
16/1 Hunterview, 16/1 Pokfulham, 20/1 Barizan<br />
20/1 Chaninbar, 20/1 Drill Sergeant, 20/1 Safari Journey<br />
25/1 Rio Gael, 33/1 Andhaar, 33/1 Olympian, 33/1 Orsippus<br />
33/1 Tarkari, 40/1 Caravel, 40/1 Mason Hindmarsh<br />
50/1 Maoi Chinn Tire.</p>
<p>* The Swinton Handicap Hurdle is over 2m<br />
* Always play with a few trends and shortlist<br />
* Horses aged 7 or more have struggled<br />
* You ideally want at least 4 hurdle starts<br />
* You want a horse with under 13 hurdle starts<br />
* Your horse must have won in their last 6 races<br />
* Avoid all horses from handicaps in Class 3 or less<br />
* You want a horse thats ran within 80 days<br />
* All past winners had ran in a Class 2 race before<br />
* Horses are strong coming from Novice Hurdles<br />
* They are best with under 4-8 runs when 1-2-3-4 last time<br />
* Most winners had 11st or less weight<br />
* The two I shortlisted from these are below<br />
* JUBAIL  &#8211; REBEL DANCER</p>
<p>Haydock 4.10</p>
<p>15/8 Victoire De Lyphar, 11/4 Society Rock<br />
3/1 Bated Breath, 4/1 Royal Rock, 20/1 Tamagin.</p>
<p>This is a Conditions race over 6f with a history<br />
going back to 1997. Dandy Nicholls keeps trying<br />
and failing to win this race and runs the seasonal<br />
debutant VICTOIRE DE LYPHAR. Only 2 past<br />
winners won first time out and none were 4yo&#8217;s<br />
like him. BATED BREATH is very sexy and in<br />
the Cammidge Trophy we could clearly see how<br />
unlucky he was. Thats not to say he would have<br />
won though. If you take the 4 year olds that ran<br />
in Listed races with 1 run this season you find a<br />
few winners. SOCIETY ROCK shares the profile.<br />
Of the pair I prefer SOCIETY ROCK. He is from<br />
a better trial race. He has more experience which<br />
has been an advantage and he has more backclass<br />
as well and overall he fits in much better to past<br />
winners than BATED BREATH. I wouldnt rule<br />
out ROYAL ROCK who is almost right and not<br />
too dissimilar to the 2002 winner who was older<br />
but overall the best profile is SOCIETY ROCK.</p>
<p>Lingfield 4.55</p>
<p>More Live Football At <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=38' title='Tote' target="_blank">Tote</a>sport.com Handicap<br />
(Turf) (CLASS 4) (4yo+ 0-85) 7f</p>
<p>9/2 Bowmaker, 11/2 Den´s Gift, 13/2 Space Station<br />
8/1 Buxton, 8/1 Wilfred Pickles, 10/1 Free For All<br />
10/1 Seek The Fair Land, 12/1 Red Yarn, 14/1 Aldermoor<br />
16/1 Leadenhall Lass, 16/1 Nezami, 16/1 Slugger O´toole<br />
20/1 Aye Aye Digby.</p>
<p>* This is a 7f Handicap for horses rated 0-84<br />
* There are 156 similar races at this time of year<br />
* You want a high draw in these races<br />
* Since 2008 there were 23 Handicaps here with 9 + runners<br />
* Horses drawn in stalls 1-2-3 had a poor 1-73 record<br />
* Recent winners came from these stalls<br />
* 11-5-16-12-18-6-14-10-11-15-17-8-10<br />
* AYE AYE DIGBY is out drawn 1<br />
* No exposed horse won absent more than 7 months<br />
* ALDERMOOR doesnt appeal in stall 2<br />
* He is an exposed debutant and may need the run<br />
* SLUGGER O´TOOLE has a poor draw in stall 3<br />
* SLUGGER O´TOOLE is exposed and first time out<br />
* RED YARN is not drawn well in stall 4<br />
* She is a 4yo filly racing first time out<br />
* 4yo fillies doing that with 7 + runs had a 0-38 record<br />
* FREE FOR ALL is 4 and last ran in a Maiden last year<br />
* Horses doing that with 2 or more runs were 0-15<br />
* I don&#8217;t like her inexperience or his stable<br />
* LEADENHALL LASS is a mare with 1 run this year<br />
* Mares with 1 run this season have a 2-61 record<br />
* None of these won or placed last time out<br />
* She find it hard to follow up with just 1 run<br />
* She won a small field 0-74 last time and this is better<br />
* BOWMAKER has a good draw but a questionable profile<br />
* I looked at 4yo Males with under 13 career starts<br />
* BOWMAKER is 4 and has only raced 7 times<br />
* Those 4 year olds with 1-2-3 runs that year were 2-73<br />
* Not a good record and both winners had Class 2 form<br />
* Those like BOWMAKER who didnt were 0-48<br />
* NEZAMI is respected despite being underraced<br />
* I cant find a similar winner his age<br />
* Not exposed with 1 run this year and an absence<br />
* I Suspect he will need 1 more run this season<br />
* WILFRED PICKLES is 5 and drops down in distance<br />
* No problem doing that but most winners had more backclass<br />
* He has no form beyond this class and it hurts his chance<br />
* So far he has lost in all 15 races on turf<br />
* All came from lower handicap marks as well<br />
* His 42 day absence hurts him as well<br />
* I also wonder if the ground may be too quick<br />
* Given all that and stall 5 of 13 he isnt for me<br />
* BUXTON is fine statistically<br />
* I just question whether he is up to this class<br />
* Most of his runs/wins are against slightly weaker horses<br />
* He is up in class today as well<br />
* One or two may have more talent<br />
* He seems to need to go round a bend as well</p>
<p>SHORTLIST</p>
<p>* DEN´S GIFT has a decent profile<br />
* He is 7 with 3 runs this year running well last time<br />
* I found 3 winners with his profile<br />
* All 3 did have a bit less weight<br />
* He is also 0-19 on Grass and has one of the weaker riders<br />
* I see him as shortlistable though</p>
<p>* SPACE STATION is a 5yo male down from 8f<br />
* SPACE STATION was well beaten last time 5 days ago<br />
* He caught the eye last time but he often does<br />
* I ran his profile carefully<br />
* I found 1 similar winner with slight differences<br />
* That winner had just over a weeks break not under<br />
* That winner had less weight as well<br />
* He didnt come from the sand either<br />
* He isnt that well handicapped either<br />
* He will also have to make sure he runs prominently<br />
* He could throw away a good draw if he doesnt</p>
<p>* SEEK THE FAIR LAND has a strong profile<br />
* Male 5 year old exposed with 2 runs this season<br />
* Coming from a 7f handicap with Class 2 backclass<br />
* I found 4 similar winners with that profile<br />
* Those not beaten more than 10 lengths were best<br />
* Those not winning last time were best<br />
* Similar horses had a 2-5 record<br />
* All his wins are on Sand but hes had few turf oppurtunities<br />
* Last time on Grass he was 3rd in a 0-95 Handicap<br />
* That was a much better race and he was out of the weights<br />
* Absent more than 10 weeks before that race as well<br />
* SEEK THE FAIR LAND has a serious chance</p>
<p>Thirsk 6.00</p>
<p>Not enough of these 6f sellers to draw any firm conclusions<br />
but I would rather have the older horses especially if having a recent run.<br />
Last years 3rd BONNIE PRINCE BLUE has a sound chance and MARK ANTHONY could also go well.<br />
Its easier to go with MARK ANTHONY on his last run but just<br />
on profiles BONNIE PRINCE BLUE comes out best.</p>
<p>Warwick 6.15</p>
<p>My gut says CHOICE OF REMARK<br />
My stats say No as no similar winner had 4 + runs</p>
<p>Thirsk 6.30</p>
<p>5/1 We´ll Deal Again, 13/2 Desert Strike, 8/1 Mullglen<br />
9/1 River Falcon, 10/1 Bossy Kitty, 10/1 Chosen One<br />
10/1 Dancing Freddy, 10/1 Sir Nod, 12/1 Leonid Glow<br />
14/1 Clear Ice, 14/1 Mandalay King, 16/1 Incomparable<br />
20/1 Sea Salt, Belin<a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=49' title='Sky' target="_blank">Sky</a>, 33/1 Ace Of Spies, 66/1 Sea Rover.</p>
<p>* This is a 6f Handicap<br />
* I found the following to all be negatives<br />
* BOSSY KITTY &#8211; INCOMPARABLE &#8211; SEA SALT<br />
* The above 3 have hideous draws<br />
* RIVER FALCON too old for one run this year<br />
* LEONID GLOW &#8211; Absent too long as a mare<br />
* SEA ROVER &#8211; BELIN<a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=49' title='Sky' target="_blank">Sky</a> both weak<br />
* ACE OF SPIES doesnt offer enough<br />
* CLEAR ICE &#8211; No 4yo won from a seller<br />
* ACE OF SPIES is unsafe<br />
* WE´LL DEAL AGAIN exposed 4yo from 5f<br />
* Similar horses were 1-59 that winner had more backclass<br />
* DANCING FREDDY fails the same angles<br />
* CHOSEN ONE &#8211; Lack of backclass troubles me<br />
* MULLGLEN &#8211; Exposed 5yo 1 run this year from 5f<br />
* Similar horses had a 0-17 record which troubles me<br />
* MANDALAY KING &#8211; Unimpressive profile<br />
* SIR NOD &#8211; Age and absence leaves him vulnerable</p>
<p>SELECTION</p>
<p>* DESERT STRIKE &#8211; Shortlisting him<br />
* Not because he is statistically sound he is just average<br />
* I have had a tip for him from a good source<br />
* Very eyecatching on video last time as well</p>
<p>Thirsk 7.00</p>
<p>* Couldnt sort this race out<br />
* I would not have backed these<br />
* Lady Chaparral &#8211; Too inexperienced for 4yo filly<br />
* The Caped Crusader &#8211; Not overkeen from 3yo handicap</p>
<p>Thirsk 7.30</p>
<p>13/2 Trans Sonic, 8/1 More Than Many, 8/1 Mujaadel<br />
8/1 Our Boy Barrington, 8/1 Ravi River, 10/1 Legal Legacy<br />
10/1 Rosbay, 14/1 Emeralds Spirit, 14/1 Fazza, 16/1 Mozayada<br />
16/1 Tobrata, 20/1 Apache Warrior, 20/1 Call Of Duty 20/1 Hill Tribe,<br />
20/1 Red Scintilla, 33/1 Baltimore Jack 33/1 Chambers, 33/1 Fifty Moore.</p>
<p>* This is a Mile Handicap<br />
* I looked at all Handicaps here with 12-18 runners<br />
* There were 23 of these races since 2009<br />
* The best place to be drawn is stalls 3-14<br />
* Recent winners came from these stalls<br />
* 7 6 7 9 4 5 3 10 7 4 12 4 3 8 6 6 9<br />
* LEGAL LEGACY &#8211; Profile not good enough to ignore draw<br />
* EMERALDS SPIRIT &#8211; Negative profile and draw<br />
* MUJAADEL won a 7f handicap last time<br />
* Horses doing that had a 1-40 record trying to follow up<br />
* That winner had 4 runs this year he has two<br />
* He looks unsafe to me<br />
* OUR BOY BARRINGTON &#8211; comes from 3yo handicap<br />
* He is a bit too exposed to be doing that<br />
* RED SCINTILLA &#8211; Fillies from 3yo handicaps are 0-31<br />
* TOBRATA &#8211; lacks backclass from 7f with 1 run this year<br />
* ROSBAY &#8211; down from 10f and 1 run this year<br />
* Thats not a safe profile and he is unsteady<br />
* BALTIMORE JACK &#8211; CHAMBERS look weak<br />
* FIFTY MOORE &#8211; Not easy to like first time<br />
* CALL OF DUTY ran too badly last time<br />
* HILL TRIBE &#8211; Didnt offer enough<br />
* APACHE WARRIOR &#8211; Too inexperienced<br />
* MOZAYADA &#8211; comes out badly<br />
* MORE THAN MANY &#8211; respected but not quite right<br />
* RAVI RIVER &#8211; respected but old to be following up<br />
* FAZZA &#8211; Strong runner<br />
* TRANS SONIC comes out well<br />
* Exposed 8yo coming from 7f with 3 + runs that year<br />
* Beaten last time but not losing more than 10 lengths<br />
* Similar horses had a 3-5 record</p>
<p>SHORTLIST</p>
<p>TRANS SONIC &#8211; Win Bet 8/1</p>
<p>FAZZA &#8211; Saver Bet 12/1</p>
<p>Warwick 7.45</p>
<p>This is a 3yo handicap over 7f. I have Freckenham as a<br />
negative failing a 0-36 statistic.  Shostakovich was not<br />
able to be matched to a winner. Tamareen just failed as<br />
he didn&#8217;t have the backclass and Nawaashi is supossed to<br />
be the owners second string. I don&#8217;t like the race but the<br />
best profile was ROSSETTI. Horses with his profile had<br />
a 6 W 2 record so I will go with him but dislike this race.</p>
<p>Warwick 8.15 &#8211; I wouldnt oppose APRIL FOOL</p>
<p>****************************************************<br />
****************************************************</p>
<p><a href="www.mathematician-betting.co.uk">www.Mathematician-Betting.co.uk</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Check For Best Prices at <a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk/odds/horses ">http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk/odds/horses </a><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/mathematician-betting-message/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Racing Tip For Thirsk</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/racing-tip-for-thirsk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/racing-tip-for-thirsk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7 Months]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Career Mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dynamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ginger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pride 25]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thirsk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thirsk 4.10
9/2 Karaka Jack, 5/1 Dubai Dynamo, 6/1 Northern Fling
7/1  Arry´s Orse, 8/1 Reel Buddy Star, 8/1 Summer Dancer
10/1 Everymanforhimself,  Ginger Ted, 12/1 Illustrious Prince 20/1 Qadar, 25/1 Arabian Pride, 25/1 Bond  Fastrac.
* This is a 7f Handicap for 0-85 rated horses
* REEL BUDDY  STAR is exposed absent 7 + months
* [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thirsk 4.10</p>
<p>9/2 Karaka Jack, 5/1 Dubai Dynamo, 6/1 Northern Fling<br />
7/1  Arry´s Orse, 8/1 Reel Buddy Star, 8/1 Summer Dancer<br />
10/1 Everymanforhimself,  Ginger Ted, 12/1 Illustrious Prince 20/1 Qadar, 25/1 Arabian Pride, 25/1 Bond  Fastrac.</p>
<p>* This is a 7f Handicap for 0-85 rated horses<br />
* REEL BUDDY  STAR is exposed absent 7 + months<br />
* Thats a lot for horse on a career  mark<br />
* Ignore the horses from 3yo handicaps<br />
* BOND FASTRAC &#8211; ARABIAN PRIDE  fail that<br />
* Horses drawn in stall 1-2 have underperformed<br />
* 30 races here  since 2008 with 9 + runners<br />
* Horses drawn in stalls 1-2 have a 1-56  record<br />
* SUMMER DANCER has a bad draw and modest profile<br />
* GINGER TED has  a bad draw and an unsafe profile<br />
* QADAR is 0-27 on Grass and vulnerable<br />
*  EVERYMANFORHIMSELF &#8211; Weight and absence is a worry<br />
* ILLUSTRIOUS PRINCE &#8211; Not  completely out of this<br />
* I dont like the massive stable downgrade he had this  winter<br />
* I wouldnt see him as progressive because of  that</p>
<p>SHORTLIST</p>
<p>* NORTHERN FLING &#8211; Shaky profile but a  possible<br />
* I&#8217;d like another run this year or a shorter absence<br />
* ARRY´S  ORSE &#8211; Almost right good enough to respect<br />
* KARAKA JACK &#8211; Well treated and  good profile<br />
* DUBAI DYNAMO &#8211; Serious chance back on fast ground<br />
* KARAKA  JACK and DUBAI DYNAMO stand out to me<br />
* DUBAI DYNAMO is a saver<br />
* KARAKA  is a win bet</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Provided by Guy Ward.</p>
<p>To visit Guy&#8217;s site click here ==&gt; <a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk">Horse Racing Tips</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/racing-tip-for-thirsk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grand National Racing Tip</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/grand-national-racing-tip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/grand-national-racing-tip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 10:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7f]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calgary Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Character Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concorde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Horses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Nationals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Putney Bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Winners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runner Ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somoza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Of Play]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=1069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I dealt with the Grand National last Sunday for full members and sent a long
preview with reasons why I felt CHARACTER BUILDING
had an outstanding chance and he is still my main selection.
He is about as fashionable as Drink Driving looking at all other opinions
but many recent winners were and if he can keep in contention [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dealt with the Grand National last Sunday for full members and sent a long<br />
preview with reasons why I felt CHARACTER BUILDING<br />
had an outstanding chance and he is still my main selection.</p>
<p>He is about as fashionable as Drink Driving looking at all other opinions<br />
but many recent winners were and if he can keep in contention for the<br />
first circuit you never know and he still looks a very big price to<br />
me at 33/1 so fingers crossed.</p>
<p>A copy of my analysis from last sunday is below.</p>
<p>AINTREE 4.15</p>
<p>John Smith´s Grand National Chase<br />
(Handicap) Grade 3 (CLASS 1) (6yo+) 4m4f</p>
<p>* The Grand National has 17 renewals since 1992<br />
* There are also 75 Handicaps in Febuary-March-April<br />
* Thats 75 Handicap Chases over 3m 7f or more<br />
* Thats 75 Handicap Chases with at least 12 runners<br />
* Thats 75 Handicap Chases in Class 2 or Higher Grade<br />
* This includes the last 17 Grand nationals<br />
* It includes the Scottish , Irish and Midlands Nationals</p>
<p>ABSENCES</p>
<p>* It is very important to have a recent race<br />
* The past 20 winners all ran within 7 weeks<br />
* The last 20 winners were absent this many days<br />
23 21 41 32 27 48 28 20 25 42 20 24 35 23 16 35 23 35 23 25<br />
* What is also significant is the absence of the Runner Ups<br />
* Horses 2nd in the National had the following days absence<br />
* 49 25 27 21 22 22 100 35 23 63 345 28 16 44 18 42 21 23 23 102<br />
* 16 of the past 20 Runners Ups also ran within 7 weeks<br />
* There are over 120 English horses absent 7 + weeks<br />
* None of these have won and I would avoid long absences</p>
<p>* BACKSTAGE has been absent since last July<br />
* CALGARY BAY has been absent 70 days<br />
* BECAUSEICOULDNTSEE has been absent 101 days<br />
* STATE OF PLAY has been absent 304 days<br />
* HELLO BUD has been absent 84 days<br />
* Other horses that fail this include the following<br />
* Majestic Concorde -  Or Noir De Somoza  &#8211; Dooneys Gate<br />
* The Tother One- Nedzers Return &#8211; Grand Slam Hero<br />
* Thats Rhythm &#8211; Frankie Figg &#8211; Our Monty &#8211; Starzaan<br />
* Royal Rosa &#8211; Putney Bridge -  Imoncloudnine</p>
<p>HORSES AGED 7</p>
<p>* The last 7 year old winner of this race was back in 1940<br />
* Horses aged 7 and unlikely to even complete the course<br />
* QUINZ has to be eliminated aged 7<br />
* QUINZ is not going to be 7 until May anyway<br />
* He is no more than 6 years 11 months old<br />
* I dont see how I can bet him given the record of 7yo&#8217;s<br />
* Quolibet &#8211; Sagalyrique &#8211; Galant Nuit are out aged 7 as well</p>
<p>8 YEAR OLDS</p>
<p>* Only 2 of the last 26 winners were 8 year olds<br />
* Horses aged 8 havent the best recent record<br />
* If you bet an 8 year old make sure it is actually 8<br />
* All recent 8yo winners were foaled early before the race<br />
* Those foaled in Mid april and Beyond are not officially 8<br />
* Bindaree &#8211; Party Politics &#8211; Corbiere are the last 8yo winners<br />
* They were all foaled early the year they were born<br />
* They were all aged 8 and a few months<br />
* Red Rum also won aged 8 and he was a January Foal<br />
* Horses foaled after the day of the race are not 8<br />
* They are just 7 and a few months old<br />
* WHAT A FRIEND is 8 and a May Foal<br />
* He is technically still a 7 year old<br />
* Other horses that fail this statistic are as follows<br />
* Majestic Concorde &#8211; Our Monty &#8211; Belon Gale<br />
* Junior &#8211; I&#8217;moncloudnine</p>
<p>HORSES AGED 13</p>
<p>* Horses aged 13 can also be opposed with confidence<br />
* HELLO BUD fails that<br />
* Especially when so lightly raced this season</p>
<p>PREPARATION (1)</p>
<p>* Exposed horses struggle with under 4 runs that season<br />
* They have a 1-184 record in 75 Similar races<br />
* The only winner was Grey Abbey &#8211; 2000 Scottish National<br />
* I would demand at least 4 runs a year from exposed horses<br />
* The Following Horses all fail this important statistic<br />
* BALLABRIGS -  STATE OF PLAY -  HELLO BUD<br />
* BACKSTAGE &#8211; CHIEF DAN GEORGE &#8211; SILVER BY NATURE<br />
* NICHE MARKET &#8211; OSCAR TIME<br />
* BLUESEA CRACKER &#8211; ARBOR SUPREME<br />
* Other horses that fail this statistic are as follows<br />
* Ballytrim -Faasel &#8211; Dev &#8211; Starzaan &#8211; Toby Jug<br />
* Comply Or Die &#8211; Frankie Figg &#8211; Junior &#8211; Royal Rosa</p>
<p>PREPARATION (2)</p>
<p>* In the 75 similar races I looked at horses with 13 + runs<br />
* These horses struggle badly with just 1-2 runs that season<br />
* Whilst horses with 21 or more starts need 4 + runs that year<br />
* Those with 13 or more runs need at least 3 + runs that year<br />
* Those that did not have a 0-144 record<br />
* Horses with 1-2 runs this season should be avoided<br />
* The last 23 winners had the following runs that season<br />
* 4 6 4 5 6 6 5 9 6 6 6 6 5 4 5 6 7 3 5 4 6 7 6</p>
<p>* The Following Horses all fail this important statistic<br />
* THE MIDNIGHT CLUB who is favourite for the race<br />
* BECAUSEICOULDNTSEE fancied as well<br />
* Also failing this statistic are the following<br />
* Our Monty &#8211; Majestic Concorde &#8211; Dooneys Gate<br />
* Roll Along &#8211; Ornais &#8211; Surface To Air &#8211; Faasel<br />
* Dev &#8211; Toby Jug- Gallant Nuit &#8211; Treacle</p>
<p>* Seasonal Debutants should be avoided<br />
* BACKSTAGE hasnt run this year under rules<br />
* Our Monty &#8211; Starzaan also have that against them</p>
<p>PREPARATION (3)</p>
<p>* Horses coming from a small field struggled<br />
* Horses from races with under 9 runners were 0-104<br />
* Not a strong statistic but worth bearing in mind<br />
* BALLABRIGGS fails that<br />
* THE TOTHER ONE also fails that<br />
* Northern Alliance &#8211; Always Waining also fails that<br />
* Skippers Brig</p>
<p>CLASS</p>
<p>* Class is very important in a National Winner<br />
* The last 10 winners all won in at least Listed Grade before<br />
* The last 20 winners had all ran in Graded Class Before<br />
* The vasy majority of the runner ups also did this<br />
* The only ones that did not were very lightly raced<br />
* All exposed horses must have Graded Form<br />
* In15 years no exposed horse won without Grade 1 form<br />
* I would not want a horse without Graded Class form<br />
* BALLABRIGGS fails that<br />
* He&#8217;s now exposed and has no form in Listed or Graded races<br />
* BECAUSEICOULDNTSEE has no Graded Form<br />
* Other horses that fail this statistic are as follows<br />
* Dooneys Gate &#8211; Nezders Return &#8211; Surface To Air<br />
* Our Monty -Belon Gale &#8211; Grand Slam Hero &#8211; Putney Bridge</p>
<p>WEIGHT</p>
<p>* I think we should ignore the weight statistics<br />
* Last years winner won with 11st 5lbs<br />
* Horses with 11st 6lbs have struggled overall<br />
* Only Red Rum had won with more weight in recent years<br />
* I would not get too hung up with weight though<br />
* Red Rum won with 11st 8lbs and again with 12st<br />
* Corbiere won with 11st 4lbs and Grittar with 11st 5lbs<br />
* L&#8217;Escargot won with 11st 3lbs and Gay Trip with 11st 5lbs<br />
* Horses with 11st 5lbs or more won in 1965 1957 1954 1050<br />
* The Precedents are there are last years winner showed that<br />
* I wont be ruling any horse out on their weight</p>
<p>WINS THAT SEASON</p>
<p>* You dont want a horse with 2 or more wins that season<br />
* Past Winners had the following number of wins that year<br />
* 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 1 1 1 0<br />
* Only 1997 winner Lord Gyliene won more than once that year<br />
* BALLABRIGGS fails this statistic<br />
* QUINZ fails that as well<br />
* WEST END ROCKER fails that<br />
* Other horses that fail this statistic are as follows<br />
* Midnight Chase &#8211; King Fontaine &#8211; Golden Kite<br />
* Skippers Brig &#8211; Putney Bridge &#8211; Sagalyrique</p>
<p>CHASING EXPERIENCE</p>
<p>* Chasing Experience is of obvious importance<br />
* The previous 20 winners had the following Chase runs<br />
* 12 24 14 13 10 11 37 41 14 12 24 17 25 10 23 16 9 14 28 14<br />
* Least Experienced Chaser was Miinnehoma in 1994<br />
* He had 9 Chase runs and two more had 10 Chase starts<br />
* Horses with Under 9 Chase runs are unlike any past winner<br />
* I looked at the Chase runs of the last 20 Runner Ups<br />
* 24 18 11 13 15 23 14 20 10 11 9 19 14 9 8 24 32 22 8<br />
* I would be wary of any horses with under 10 Chase starts<br />
* The following horses had under 10 Chase Starts<br />
* THE MIDNIGHT CLUB is favourite with 8 Chase starts<br />
* Thats only really 7 Chases as he had one early fall<br />
* THE TOTHER ONE only has 9 Chase starts<br />
* BECAUSEICOULDNTSEE has only had 7 Chase starts<br />
* QUINZ has only had 7 Chase starts<br />
* Other horses with fewer Chase runs than ideal are:<br />
* Synchronised &#8211; Majestic Concorde &#8211; Nezders Return<br />
* King Fontaine &#8211; Ornais &#8211; Surface To Air -Our Monty<br />
* Skippers Brig &#8211; Giles Cross &#8211; Starzaan-Gallant Nuit -Junior</p>
<p>JUMPING ABILITY</p>
<p>* You want a decent Jumper of course<br />
* The last 11 winners had not fallen more than twice before<br />
* I wouldnt rule a horse out on this statistic<br />
* It is something to bear in Mind<br />
* BIG FELLA THANKS fell or unseated in 3 of 15 chases<br />
* SILVER BY NATURE has fallen in 3 of 14 chase starts<br />
* NOTRE PERE has fallen 3 times before<br />
* ARBOR SUPREME  has fallen 3 times before<br />
* The following horses fail this as well<br />
* Quolibet &#8211; Frankie Figg &#8211; The Sawyer &#8211; Pomme Tiepy</p>
<p>CURRENT FORM</p>
<p>* You want a horse that was 1-2-3 in at least one of the last 6 runs<br />
* Horse that havent done that score badly in all similar races<br />
* COMPLY OR DIE has not managed that in 6 runs<br />
* ROLL ALONG also fails that</p>
<p>STEPPING UP IN DISTANCE</p>
<p>* The record of horses from 2m 4f or shorter is awful<br />
* This is worse when its a Chase over 2m 4f or shorter<br />
* No exposed horse won from a 2m 6f Chase or shorter<br />
* The following horses have this to overcome<br />
* BIG FELLA THANKS has to come from 2m 4f<br />
* NICHE MARKET also comes up in distance<br />
* Or Noir De Somoza &#8211; Dooneys Gate &#8211; Scotsirish<br />
* Northern Alliance &#8211; In Compliance &#8211; Santa&#8217;s Son<br />
* Askthemaster &#8211; Dev &#8211; Starzaan &#8211; Duers &#8211; Treacle</p>
<p>STAMINA</p>
<p>* Every winner since 1970 had won over at least 3m<br />
* The following horses have this to overcome<br />
* BECAUSEICOULDNTSEE hasnt won at 3m yet<br />
* The following also fail this statistic<br />
* Or Noir De Somoza &#8211; Scotsirish -  Nezders Return<br />
* Quolibet &#8211; In Compliance &#8211; Santa&#8217;s Son &#8211; Piraya<br />
* Faasel &#8211; Putney Bridge -  Askthemaster -Dev<br />
* Starzaan  &#8211; Duers</p>
<p>HANDICAP CHASE FORM</p>
<p>* Recent winners had ran in the following Handicap Chases<br />
*  5 21 8 8 6 6 24 33 7 12 14 12 15 7 16 7 4 7<br />
* Every recent winner has ran in at least 4 Handicap Chases<br />
* Horses running in 5-12 Handicap Chases did well<br />
* They won 12 of the last 18 renewals<br />
* I would like to see at least 4 previous Handicap Chase runs<br />
* THE MIDNIGHT CLUB is favourite<br />
* He has only ran in 2 Handicap Chases before<br />
* WHAT A FRIEND has only ran in 1 handicap chase<br />
* TIDAL BAY has raced in just 2 handicap chases<br />
* OSCAR TIME has raced in just 3 handicap chases<br />
* BECAUSEICOULDNTSEE has just 1 handicap chase runs<br />
* The following horses also fail this<br />
* Synchronised &#8211; Majestic Concorde &#8211; Or Noir De Somoza<br />
* Scotsirish &#8211; Quolibet &#8211; Roll Along &#8211; Ornais &#8211; Junior<br />
* Our Monty &#8211; Surface To Air &#8211; Starzaan &#8211; Toby Jug</p>
<p>O T H E R   A N G L E S</p>
<p>* Number of Handicap Chases won<br />
* Recent winners had won the following Handicap Chases<br />
* 1 2 1 3 3 2 3 6 0 4 4 5 4 3 3 1 1 2<br />
* No past winner had won more than 6 Handicap Chases</p>
<p>* The last 18 winners had between 3 and 7 Chase wins before<br />
* They had  4 3 5 4 3 3 5 7 3 5 6 5 7 3 5 6 4 5 Chase wins</p>
<p>C O N C L U S I O N</p>
<p>Whilst he is progressive THE MIDNIGHT CLUB has plenty<br />
to prove as favourite when lightly raced and having just two runs<br />
this year and at the price I am against him especially as he has just<br />
two runs in Handicap Chases losing both. Others I dislike at the head<br />
of the market as I see their preparation as wrong include<br />
WHAT A FRIEND &#8211; STATE OF PLAY &#8211; BECAUSEICOULDNTSEE -<br />
NICHE MARKET &#8211; QUINZ &#8211; HELLO BUD &#8211; ARBOR SUPREME -<br />
BALLABRIGGS.<br />
I&#8217;m against MERIGO as he doesnt look about to win and there must be a big form and fitness question.</p>
<p>POSSIBLES</p>
<p>OSCAR TIME doesnt offer enough given his price as He is<br />
failing one of the strong stats. BACKSTAGE is technically<br />
wrong with an absence but there is a temptation to ignore<br />
that as he is Irish and has been Point To Pointing and that counts for something.<br />
There will be a serious stamina doubt with him but you can argue he comes<br />
from the same sire as Mon Mome the 2009 winner. I shouldnt select him<br />
but he&#8217;s one of those that could win and it wouldnt shock me.<br />
I dont  agree with people who say BIG FELLA THANKS does not stay.<br />
He has been 4th and 6th in the last 2 Nationals.<br />
Once when Under 7 years old and again when under 8 years old  and in<br />
Neither race was he remotely equipped to win this race failing several angles<br />
and his two performances in the race were remarkable. I really dont like the<br />
fact he comes from 2m 4f but he does have a chance in this race.<br />
Given a weight of 11st 10lbs DONT PUSH IT is bound to fail a weight statistic<br />
but thats all he does fail and having won this last season and having promised<br />
myself not to worry about the weight too much I think he is shortlistable much<br />
as he has a stiff mark and the last time he ran over fences was in this race last<br />
year which I dont see as an advantage.</p>
<p>WEST END ROCKER has plenty on his side considering<br />
he is a 50/1 chance but I prefer others. I think Mares are<br />
quite interesting in this race but BLUESEA CRACKER is<br />
exposed and only has 3 runs this season and that makes<br />
her unlike any recent winners. SILVER BY NATURE is<br />
a big danger. He has been very impressive and probably<br />
underestimated by many but he isnt for me mainly down<br />
to the likely ground and the fact he is short of runs this<br />
season. I dont see VIC VENTURI winning with so much<br />
weight at his age but he passes most of the better angles.<br />
So to does KILLYGLEN much as he is complicated and<br />
has only finished in 5 of his last 9 Chases a big worry. I<br />
think TIDAL BAY has a good chance and I have backed<br />
him as well. He has a great Aintree record and has never<br />
fallen before. Throw in Bags of Class and 50/1 there are<br />
worse bets and he could run very well for an old rogue.</p>
<p>PROVISIONAL SELECTION</p>
<p>CHARACTER BUILDING 33/1</p>
<p>Getting his profile out of the way first have a similar<br />
type winning. In 2004 Amberleigh House won when<br />
an exposed 11 year old with 5 runs that season. It&#8217;s<br />
also interesting that Amberleigh House had his prep<br />
run in the Grimthorpe Chase at Doncaster and thats<br />
where CHARACTER BUILDING last ran. There is<br />
a similar profile there and enough to be confident in<br />
CHARACTER BUILDING that he is the right type.</p>
<p>CHARACTER BUILDING came 7th in the 2010<br />
race beaten 37 lengths. That does not worry me for<br />
several reasons. He simply was not fit. He had won<br />
at the 2009 Cheltenham Festival. He ran just twice<br />
in the next 15 Months and by the 2010 National<br />
he had only had 2 runs that season which is simply<br />
not enough for a horse like him. He went there as<br />
unfit and underprepared and out of form. There is<br />
more to his run than meets the eye. He jumped all<br />
the way round. This is a horse who has never fallen<br />
in his life before and that counts for plenty. In last<br />
years race he proved he handled the track. He was<br />
mid division most of the way. Some will say that<br />
he is unable to lay up close to the front but I have<br />
to answer that by stating he was out of form last<br />
year and underraced that season and he wasnt fit.</p>
<p>I watched the video of last years Grand National.<br />
When DON&#8217;T PUSH IT jumped the penultimate<br />
fence in front CHARACTER BUILDING was just<br />
3 seconds behind him staying on overtaking quite<br />
a few horses. He then faded but he was entitled to<br />
as he was not fit and he blew up and came home in<br />
7th place. In last years race he was a 16/1 chance.<br />
This year He has a considerably better profile yet<br />
is twice the price. This year he has 5 prep runs to<br />
go to war with 3 more than last year. He also has<br />
7lbs less weight this year which must help. He has<br />
twice proven himself at this distance. He&#8217;s proved<br />
he stays marathon trips before. He finished second<br />
in the 4m National Hunt Chase at Cheltenham in<br />
1997 when having a poor profile and badly treated<br />
at the weights. He should have placed in this race<br />
last year had he been fit. I see enough stamina and<br />
Class there. CHARACTER BUILDING&#8217;s trainer is<br />
John Quinn who&#8217;s won with 3 of his last 5 runners<br />
and has struck form this week which must help.</p>
<p>So many of this years rivals are underraced and do<br />
not have enough runs this season. The previous 23<br />
winners had these following runs that season</p>
<p>4 6 4 5 6 6 5 9 6 6 6 6 5 4 5 6 7 3 5 4 6 7 6</p>
<p>CHARACTER BUILDING fits that like a Glove as<br />
he has 5 runs. We know all past winners had under<br />
7 wins in Handicap Chases and he does that as well.<br />
Its also very interesting the last 18 winners of this<br />
had 4 3 5 4 3 3 5 7 3 5 6 5 7 3 5 6 4 5 chase wins<br />
and CHARACTER BUILDING fits in well with 3.<br />
I can not find a better option and he looks the one</p>
<p>33/1 and 5 places at <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=1' title='bet365' target="_blank">Bet365</a> and <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=43' title='stan james' target="_blank">Stan James</a><br />
<a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=30' title='VC' target="_blank">VC</a> offer 6 places but are currently 25/1</p>
<p>Guy Ward</p>
<p>****************</p>
<p>Guy Ward is one of the uk&#8217;s hardest working horse racing analysts.</p>
<p>Find out more about at service at this link <a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk">Horse Racing Tips</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/grand-national-racing-tip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Know Your All Weather Race Types</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/know-your-all-weather-race-types/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/know-your-all-weather-race-types/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consecutive Losers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade Contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negative Angles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rank Outsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reader Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Return On Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Six Years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sr 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=1024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Know Your All Weather  Race Types  by David Renham
This is the second  article in a series of three all weather articles – the first being  on southwell Sires In this piece I am going to look at specific race  types in attempt to help you, the reader, gain that important [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><strong>Know Your All Weather  Race Types  by David Renham</strong></span></p>
<p><span>This is the second  article in a series of three all weather articles – the first being  on southwell Sires In this piece I am going to look at specific race  types in attempt to help you, the reader, gain that important edge over  “the crowd”. Many punters are put off the all weather due to the  general standard of racing – low grade handicaps, claimers and sellers  are regular events on the all weather circuit, but there are plenty  of positive and negative angles that once appreciated can improve your  chances of making a profit. The focus of this article is these lower  grade contests.</span></p>
<p><span>The data for this article  is taken from last six years; ROI stands for return on investment; SR  stands for strike rate and LTO stands for last time out. Unless otherwise  stated, all profit and losses are quoted to industry starting price.</span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<p><span><strong>Claiming races</strong></span></p>
<p><span><strong>Market</strong> – the  top three in the betting have provided just under 74% of the winners.  Favourites have an especially good record in all weather claimers scoring  35.6% of the time. Indeed backing all favourites “blind” would have  yielded very small losses of 4%. Indeed backing all favourites since  the inception of <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=66' title='Betfair' target="_blank">Betfair</a> SP would have seen you break even and that  is taking commission into account. Longer priced horses have a poor  record and runners priced 16/1 or bigger show significant losses. Their  record reads 73 wins from 3570 qualifiers (SR 2%) showing losses of  £1473.00 to (ROI -41.3%). At the completely rank outsider stage –  horses priced 80/1 or bigger have produced 425 consecutive losers with  just 8 of them managing a place.</span></p>
<p><span><strong>Last time out</strong> – horses that won LTO go on to win again just over 25% of the time  in claimers, and backing all such runners would have produced losses  of around 11%. Horses that won on the all weather LTO are much better  betting propositions that horses that won on the turf LTO – strike  rates of 26% against 15% confirm this. Indeed, regardless of LTO position,  it is an advantage to have raced on the all weather LTO rather than  on the turf LTO.</span></p>
<p><span><strong>Age</strong> – interestingly  older horses have a better strike rate than younger ones in all age  claimers. Horses aged 3 to 5 have a combined strike rate of 8.7%, whereas  horses aged 6 or older have a combined strike rate of 14.4%. </span></p>
<p><span><strong>Sex of horse</strong> – In claimers colts, geldings and horses are 1.62 times more likely  to win than fillies and mares.</span></p>
<p><span><strong>Miscellaneous stats:</strong></span></p>
<p><span>1. Horses that are  racing for a new stable in all weather claiming races score around 9%  of the time, but backing all runners would have lost you about 46% (46p  for every £1 wagered);</span></p>
<p><span>2. Maiden runners have  a poor record in claimers scoring just 6% of the time and losing around  37%;</span></p>
<p><span>3. Horses that have  recorded 2 or more course successes have a decent strike rate of 17%  and backing all runners would have yielded very small losses of 2.2%;</span></p>
<p><span>4. Horses having their  first ever racecourse outing are worth avoiding with only 7 wins from  229 qualifiers (SR 3.1%). Backing all debutants would have produced  significant losses of £149.50 (ROI -65.3%);</span></p>
<p><span>5. Horses that raced  in a claiming race last time have a strike rate of 15%; compare this  to horses that raced in a selling race last time whose strike rate is  under 8%;</span></p>
<p><span>6. The following trainers  secured a strike rate of 20% or better during the 6-year study (from  at least 60 runners) – Tom Dascombe, Dandy Nicholls, Kevin Ryan, Jim  Boyle, Jack Pearce, Gary Moore. </span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span><strong>Selling races</strong></span></p>
<p><span><strong>Market</strong> – the  top three in the betting have provided 71.7% of the winners with favourites  winning a third of all races. Backing all selling favourites would have  yielded a loss of 6.8%. There are two favourite stats worth noting;  firstly horses priced 8/11 or shorter have scored over 70% of the time  and backing them all would have produced a profit of 10%; secondly favourites  returning to the track less than 10 days since their last run have provided  89 winners from 227 (SR 39.2%) for a profit of £19.55 (ROI +8.6%).   Runners priced 25/1 or bigger have an extremely poor record &#8211; just 20  wins from 1887 qualifiers (SR 1.1%) showing huge losses of £1164.00  to (ROI -61.7%). Horses priced 50/1 or bigger have produced just 3 winners  from 890 runners for losses of over 81%.</span></p>
<p><span><strong>Last time out</strong> – horses that won LTO are not good propositions in selling races.  They win roughly 1 time in 5 but backing all runners would have yielded  losses of around 19%. One area worth noting is that horses that ran  LTO in 3yo or all age maidens have a dreadful strike rate &#8211; they have  provided just 14 winners from 317 qualifiers (SR 4.4%). </span></p>
<p><span><strong>Age</strong> – as with  claiming races, older horses have a better strike rate than younger  ones in all age claimers. However, the bias is less pronounced. Horses  aged 3 to 5 have a combined strike rate of 9%, whereas horses aged 6  or older have a combined strike rate of 12.2%. </span></p>
<p><span><strong>Sex of horse</strong> – in sellers once again colts, geldings and horses have an edge over  fillies and mares. However, it is not quite as clear cut as it was in  claimers with the male to female success ratio in sellers standing at  1.4. </span></p>
<p><span><strong>Miscellaneous stats:</strong></span></p>
<p><span>1. Horses upped in  class have won just 4.5% of the time; horses racing in the same class  as LTO have won 10.3% of the time; horses dropping in class have won  11.4% of the time;</span></p>
<p><span>2. Trainers Peter Evans,  Jim Boyle, Gary Moore and George Baker are trainers who have good records  in selling races on the all weather;</span></p>
<p><span>3. Horses carrying  high weights in sellers have a better strike rate than those carrying  low weights. Horses carrying 9st or more have a strike rate of 12.6%;  horses carrying under 9st have a strike rate of 8.8%;</span></p>
<p><span>4. For “in running”  punters it should be noted that the early leader of a 5f seller goes  on to win over 25% of the time.</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span><strong>Handicap races (class 6 or lower)</strong></span></p>
<p><span><strong>Market</strong> – the  top three in the betting have provided just over 54% of the winners.  Favourites win around 1 race in 4 (26% to be precise) for losses of  under 7%. The most successful favourites in handicaps have been in 2yo  nurseries &#8211; a strike rate of 30.4% and profits of 6%. 3yo only handicaps  see favourites perform solidly thanks to a strike rate of 30.9% with  losses amounting to less than 2%. Lingfield has been most successful  track for low grade handicap favourites producing a break even situation  to SP.</span></p>
<p><span><strong>Last time out</strong> – LTO winners score 16.6% of the time, with losses standing at 19%.  However, if the LTO winners return to the track within 7 days their  strike rate increases to 24%. These quick returns score 37% of the time  and reach a break even situation if they start favourite. However, beware  of LTO winners that start 10/1 or bigger in the betting – they have  won just 4.4% of the time with steep losses of 38%. </span></p>
<p><span>Horses that ran in  handicaps LTO are better betting propositions that horses that ran in  non handicaps LTO – strike rates of 9% against 6.5% confirm this.  The returns for each category though do not totally mirror the strike  rates with losses of 21% for runners that ran in handicaps LTO, compared  with losses of 25% for runners who ran LTO in non handicaps.</span></p>
<p><span><strong>Sex of horse</strong> – the male to female success ratio is 1.3 in low grade handicaps open  to both sexes. Percentage losses for male runners stand at only 17%  compared with 28% for females. It is also should be noted that female  runners have really struggled at Lingfield – their strike rate at  the Surrey track is just 5.6% and losses are over 40%. Male runners  have a definite advantage over female runners in these handicaps.</span></p>
<p><span><strong>Miscellaneous stats:</strong></span></p>
<p><span>1. Female runners returning  to the track after a break of 57 or more days have a poor record –  just 92 wins from 1967 runners (SR 4.7%) for a loss of £788.17 (ROI  -40.1%); </span></p>
<p><span>2. Colts when starting  favourites have been fairly rare (around 40 per year). However, of the  225 qualifiers over the past 6 seasons, 86 have won (SR 38.2%) for a  profit of £50.05 (ROI +22.2%);</span></p>
<p><span>3. Runners priced 25/1  or bigger have won 2.1% of the time for losses to SP of 25%. However,  since <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=66' title='Betfair' target="_blank">Betfair</a> Starting Price was introduced in 2008 you could have made  a profit by backing them all at BSP. Despite having only 70 winners  from 3717 runners, you would have made a profit of £730.88 (ROI +19.7%).</span></p>
<p><span>I hope this article  has shown you that the all weather offers betting opportunities in all  race types – you just need to do some digging!</span></p>
<p><span>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</span></p>
<p>Dave Renham is a leading researcher into uk horse racing.</p>
<p>His site at <a href="http://www.www.PunterProfits.com">www.PunterProfits.com</a> contains a lot more of his research work. Some is free and some is member only. It&#8217;s a good site for racing realists who believe that knowing your stats is a likely root to success.</p>
<p>The private boards there contain many interesting and highly past profitable threads maintained by members of punterprofits who obvioulsy have learnt a trick or two from all Dave&#8217;s horse racing research teachings.</p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/know-your-all-weather-race-types/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stats For Lingfield</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/stats-for-lingfield/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/stats-for-lingfield/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maidens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Types]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stats For Lingfield
 
Favourites



Race type
Wins
Bets
SR (%)
Profit
ROI (%)
Race Times


3yo+   maidens
88
220
40.0
+£1.44
+0.7
2.20, 4.00


3yo+/4yo+   handicaps
427
1665
25.7
-£74.70
-4.5
1.20,   2.55,
3.25, 4.30



 
FAVOURITE STATS &#8211; this is a section looking at the stats for favourites certain race types. These race types occur less often so the course favourite stats for such races would have fairly small samples &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stats For Lingfield</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Favourites</strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="589">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="187" valign="bottom">Race type</td>
<td width="55" valign="bottom">Wins</td>
<td width="55" valign="bottom">Bets</td>
<td width="71" valign="bottom">SR (%)</td>
<td width="71" valign="bottom">Profit</td>
<td width="71" valign="bottom">ROI (%)</td>
<td width="81" valign="bottom">Race Times</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="187" valign="bottom">3yo+   maidens</td>
<td width="55" valign="bottom">88</td>
<td width="55" valign="bottom">220</td>
<td width="71" valign="bottom">40.0</td>
<td width="71" valign="bottom">+£1.44</td>
<td width="71" valign="bottom">+0.7</td>
<td width="81" valign="bottom">2.20, 4.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="187" valign="bottom">3yo+/4yo+   handicaps</td>
<td width="55" valign="bottom">427</td>
<td width="55" valign="bottom">1665</td>
<td width="71" valign="bottom">25.7</td>
<td width="71" valign="bottom">-£74.70</td>
<td width="71" valign="bottom">-4.5</td>
<td width="81" valign="bottom">1.20,   2.55,</p>
<p>3.25, 4.30</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>FAVOURITE STATS &#8211; </strong>this is a section looking at the stats for favourites certain race types. These race types occur less often so the course favourite stats for such races would have fairly small samples &#8211; hence they have been grouped together to give you an overview.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="601">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="167" valign="bottom">Race type</td>
<td width="67" valign="bottom">Wins</td>
<td width="67" valign="bottom">Bets</td>
<td width="67" valign="bottom">SR</td>
<td width="75" valign="bottom">Profit</td>
<td width="75" valign="bottom">ROI</td>
<td width="85" valign="bottom">Race Times</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="167" valign="bottom">3yo+/4yo+ sellers</td>
<td width="67" valign="bottom">321</td>
<td width="67" valign="bottom">1018</td>
<td width="67" valign="bottom">31.5</td>
<td width="75" valign="bottom">+£29.07</td>
<td width="75" valign="bottom">+2.9</td>
<td width="85" valign="bottom">Ling 1.50</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>DRAW SECTION</strong> &#8211; the stats are collated from studying 10+ runner handicaps. Each race is split into three &#8211; a top third of the draw, a middle third of the draw and a bottom third of the draw.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="589">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="215" valign="bottom">Course &amp; distance (time)</td>
<td width="147" valign="bottom">Bottom third win %</td>
<td width="147" valign="bottom">Middle third win%</td>
<td width="81" valign="bottom">Top third win%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Lingfield aw 7f (1.20)</td>
<td valign="bottom">32</td>
<td valign="bottom">37</td>
<td width="81" valign="bottom">32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Lingfield aw 6f (2.55)</td>
<td valign="bottom">35</td>
<td valign="bottom">37</td>
<td width="81" valign="bottom">29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">Lingfield aw 1m (4.30)</td>
<td valign="bottom">30</td>
<td valign="bottom">32</td>
<td width="81" valign="bottom">38</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>This information was provided by <a href="http://www.racingtrends.co.uk/">www.RacingTrends.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/stats-for-lingfield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hennessy Racing Tip</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/hennessy-racing-tip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/hennessy-racing-tip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Fella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carruthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debutant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dream Alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henessy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hennessy Gold Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hennessy horse racing tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hey Big Spender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neptune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niche Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outsider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Razor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Winners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird Al]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hennessy Racing Tip
This fairly comprehensive Hennessy analysis was provided by Guy Ward.
To visit Guy&#8217;s site click here ==&#62; Horse Racing Tips
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;
The Hennessy is top class and a fascinating puzzle.
I am going for an outsider.
This has to be the best quality Hennessy in recent years.
There are a dozen that can win.
My choice is not one of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hennessy Racing Tip</p>
<p>This fairly comprehensive Hennessy analysis was provided by Guy Ward.</p>
<p>To visit Guy&#8217;s site click here ==&gt; <a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk" target="_blank">Horse Racing Tips</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>The Hennessy is top class and a fascinating puzzle.<br />
I am going for an outsider.<br />
This has to be the best quality Hennessy in recent years.<br />
There are a dozen that can win.<br />
My choice is not one of the safer bets and he may easily<br />
run badly for any number of reasons but I like him at<br />
the price and feel there are good reasons to bet him<br />
at more than 20/1 so I&#8217;m going with CARRUTHERS</p>
<p>NEWBURY 3.05</p>
<p>Hennessy Gold Cup Chase Handicap Grade 3<br />
(CLASS 1) (4yo+) 3m2f110y</p>
<p>9/2 Denman, 11/2 Weird Al, 15/2 Burton Port<br />
8/1 Diamond Harry, 8/1 Pandorama, 12/1 Big Fella Thanks<br />
12/1 Taranis, 16/1 Madison Du Berlais, 16/1 Neptune Collonges 20/1 Carruthers,<br />
20/1 Hey Big Spender, 25/1 Silver By Nature 33/1 The Tother One, 40/1 Barbers Shop,<br />
40/1 Niche Market 50/1 Dream Alliance, 50/1 Razor Royale, 150/1 <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=34' title='Hills' target="_blank">Hills</a> Of Aran.</p>
<p>* The Hennessy is a 0-182 Handicap Chase<br />
* This is a Top Class Handicap for 0-182 rated horses<br />
* There are 18 renewals since 1992<br />
* Horses with 6-20 career starts dominate the Hennessy<br />
* Recent winners had the following National Hunt runs<br />
* 17-34-10-12-11-6- 6-18-18-16-12-7-14-5-17-16<br />
* Horses with Under 8 runs in Handicaps dominate<br />
* The winners had the following runs in Handicaps<br />
* 21-0-1-0-1-1-7-1-1-1-1-7-2-7-1-1-11-3-1-1-8<br />
* The last few winners had the following Chase races<br />
* 12-29-5-4-4-6-4-11-6-5-6-7-11-5-13-7<br />
* Finishing 1st-2nd last time is important<br />
* 16 of the last 17 winners were 1st or 2nd last time</p>
<p>NEGATIVES</p>
<p>* BARBERS SHOP can&#8217;t win after a dreadfull last run.<br />
* SILVER BY NATURE doesnt appeal to me<br />
* I dont want an exposed seasonal debutant<br />
* He may be using this for a Welsh National prep race<br />
* He doesnt have the backclass for a Hennessy winner<br />
* NICHE MARKET- <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=34' title='Hills' target="_blank">Hills</a> OF ARAN are outclassed<br />
* RAZOR ROYALE &#8211; DREAM ALLIANCE are outclassed<br />
* DENMAN tries to win this for the 3rd time<br />
* He won with this weight in 2007 and 2009<br />
* This year I would rather oppose him<br />
* His 2 wins in this race came from marks of 161 and 174<br />
* Today he a better class field and a tough mark of 182<br />
* This is his hardest task in this race and I dont like his chance<br />
* DENMAN is a 10 year old<br />
* Since 1992 horses aged 10 or more are 0-46 in this race<br />
* The last winner his aged was back in 1981<br />
* Before that the previous one was in 1967<br />
* He is more exposed than almost all the past 18 winners</p>
<p>* He is possibly on the downgrade now on last years evidence<br />
* Dissapointed in 2 of his last 3 runs and he has plenty to prove<br />
* Statistically DENMAN is weak in this years race</p>
<p>* THE TOTHER ONE has run this year in a Graded Chase<br />
* Horses with that profile had a 0-23 record<br />
* He doesnt look well handicapped at the moment<br />
* 7 Chase starts and he only has 1 win in a Novice Chase<br />
* Well down the stable pecking order he may lack the class</p>
<p>* DIAMOND HARRY may fail for lack of experience<br />
* I looked at 7yo seasonal debutants with Grade 1 form<br />
* Those with 9-20 career starts from Grade 1 races were 2-3<br />
* Trabolgan (2005) and Denman (2007) had this profile<br />
* They only other that had it was a 1st fence faller in 2003<br />
* That W F W record makes DIAMOND HARRY interesting<br />
* Its fair to say the 2 similar winners won the Sun Alliance last time<br />
* DIAMOND HARRY Pulled up in the Sun Alliance<br />
* In his favour though is he carries 24lbs less weight<br />
* There is a concern whether he has enough Chase experience<br />
* The last few winners had the following Chase races<br />
* 12-29-5-4-4-6-4-11-6-5-6-7-11-5-13-7<br />
* DIAMOND HARRY only has 3 Chase starts<br />
* He only completed in 2 of those races<br />
* His only wins came in tiny fields and lack of experience hurts him</p>
<p>* TARANIS is a 9yo seasonal debutant<br />
* He has a superb record when running after an absence<br />
* His main problem is the record of debutants his age<br />
* Since 1992 Seasonal debutants aged 9 or more are 0-42<br />
* He is quite exposed for a seasonal debutant<br />
* Thats my main objection to him<br />
* He is older and more exposed than ideal for a debutant<br />
* NEPTUNE COLLONGES has the same problem<br />
* He is 9 and has not run in 624 days<br />
* No past winner has won with anything like that absence<br />
* No exposed horse has won first time out anyway<br />
* NEPTUNE COLLONGES doesnt appeal with that absence</p>
<p>* BIG FELLA THANKS has ran once this season<br />
* Horses doing that with 9 + career starts won 7 races<br />
* They all had form in Grade 1 or Grade 2 races though<br />
* Those like BIG FELLA THANKS that didnt were 0-20<br />
* None ran this year in a Non Handicap either<br />
* Statistically I cant match him to a winner<br />
* My main doubt is whether he has the Class to win<br />
* I Looked at past winners with No Grade 1 or Grade 2 form<br />
* Those with 9 or more career starts doing that were 1-41<br />
* The only winner was 40/1 shock Sibton Abbey in 1991<br />
* He was younger as well and overall I am unimpressed</p>
<p>* PANDORAMA is a 7yo seasonal debutant<br />
* Debutants aged 7 like him with Grade 1 form were 3-14<br />
* These 3 winners had 4-5-6 chase starts<br />
* PANDORAMA only has 3 Chase starts<br />
* The last few winners had the following Chase races<br />
* 12-29-5-4-4-6-4-11-6-5-6-7-11-5-13-7<br />
* That makes him less experience than any recent winner<br />
* He has won all 3 of his Chase starts though<br />
* Lack of Chasing experience is his biggest problem<br />
* He also has to prove he stays this far as well</p>
<p>* MADISON DU BERLAIS is exposed unlike most winners<br />
* He did win this when exposed though in 2008<br />
* With less weight this year I dont ignore his chance<br />
* I can match him to any past winners now though<br />
* No past winner came from a Hurdles race either<br />
* I will be surprised if he wins again</p>
<p>* BURTON PORT is a 6yo seasonal debutant<br />
* The only recent winner like that was in 2006<br />
* That winner had Grade 1 form like and won last time<br />
* Horses sharing BURTON PORT&#8217;s profile were 1-2<br />
* You can argue neither horse came from a Grade 2 chase<br />
* No past winner came from a Grade 2 Chase first time out<br />
* Take 6 year old seasonal debutants from Grade 2 Chases<br />
* There were 2 horses with that profile in the last 18 years<br />
* These 2 horses finished 7 + F<br />
* As a rule 6 year old debutants with Grade 1 form are fine<br />
* BURTON PORT has the correct exposure as well<br />
* He is a small horse though and isnt guaranteed to stay<br />
* BURTON PORT is a net positive though</p>
<p>* HEY BIG SPENDER won  first time out this year<br />
* No winner did that from a Non Handicap Though<br />
* He has yet to prove he stays this far<br />
* He has fallen twice in his last 3 Chase starts as well<br />
* Only 1 year ago he was in Novice Handicap Chases<br />
* I cant rule him out but he doesnt offer enough</p>
<p>SHORTLIST</p>
<p>* WEIRD AL has run this season in a Non Handicap Chase<br />
* No horse running this year came from a Non Handicap<br />
* WEIRD AL has only ran 6 times under rules<br />
* Horses with 1 run this year and under 9 career starts won 2 races<br />
* None came from 2m 4f as he has to do<br />
* Both winners came from Handicap Chases and he doesnt<br />
* None were aged 7 like he was as well<br />
* I cant rule him out but I cant match him exactly<br />
* His 4 Chase wins came in fields of 4 5 5 6 runners<br />
* This will be a much different test for him</p>
<p>* CARRUTHERS is given a chance at 25/1<br />
* He didnt run that well in his seasonal debut<br />
* Being Unplaced that makes him unlike any past winner<br />
* He was beaten 23 lengths last time out<br />
* However his chance is similar to the  2008 winner<br />
* Madison Du Berlais won this in 2008 from the same race<br />
* Although Madison Du Berlais placed in his prep run<br />
* He was beaten 25 lengths that day less than Carruthers<br />
* That was in the same Ascot race which is interesting<br />
* CARRUTHERS is the same age as he was<br />
* He also has far less weight as well<br />
* I dont see a reason why CARRUTHERS cant win<br />
* He does look a small field horse but thats unproven<br />
* Throw out his Cheltenham runs and that improves it<br />
* Throw out his Cheltenham runs and his seasonal debuts<br />
* His record then becomes W 2 W W W W W 2<br />
* As a smaller horse he&#8217;ll be much better suited to a lightweight<br />
* I think CARRUTHERS is worth shortlisting</p>
<p>Todays Suggested Bets</p>
<p>Newbury 3.05</p>
<p>CARRUTHERS 20/1 each way<br />
<a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=49' title='Sky' target="_blank">Sky</a> <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=30' title='VC' target="_blank">VC</a> <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=38' title='Tote' target="_blank">Tote</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/hennessy-racing-tip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ayr Gold Cup Tip</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/ayr-gold-cup-tip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/ayr-gold-cup-tip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayr Gold Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Castles In The Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cup Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fridays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horse betting advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish Heartbeat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JONNY MUDBALL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mcgrew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Member Message]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mudball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noverre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partner 25]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peltro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Hill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AYR GOLD CUP TIP
This comes from Guy aka The Mathematician
To Visit Guys site click here ==&#62; Horse Betting Advice
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;
I nailed my colours to Johnny Mudball&#8217;s mast in Fridays full member message.
Quite surprised Pricewise have tipped him too today.
I&#8217;m not sure there is any value in the price now
but full members would have backed him at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AYR GOLD CUP TIP</p>
<p>This comes from Guy aka The Mathematician</p>
<p>To Visit Guys site click here ==&gt; <a href="http://mathematician-betting.co.uk">Horse Betting Advice</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
I nailed my colours to Johnny Mudball&#8217;s mast in Fridays full member message.<br />
Quite surprised Pricewise have tipped him too today.<br />
I&#8217;m not sure there is any value in the price now<br />
but full members would have backed him at 11/1 and 12/1 on Friday.</p>
<p>Arguably with pricewise coming in today and smashing the price down a touch<br />
I should have picked a different race for you today here on the free blog.</p>
<p>I did get a few emails seeking thoughts on the Ayr Gold Cup however<br />
so thought it would be the most popular race to cover here today for you.</p>
<p>Find Current Best Odds at<br />
<a href="http://mathematician-betting.bestbetting.com/horse-racing/2010-09-18/ayr/15-20/betting/" target="_blank">http://mathematician-betting.bestbetting.com/horse-racing/2010-09-18/ayr/15-20/betting/</a></p>
<p>Personally looking at the stats for these races<br />
I think IRISH HEARTBEAT has a better profile than<br />
anything in either race and I am slightly more hopeful<br />
that he will win the Silver Cup at 2.15pm. I plan a bit<br />
on him around 9/1 or 10/1 but low stakes in this race.</p>
<p>This is my friday message on the Ayr Gold Cup</p>
<p>AYR 3.20</p>
<p><a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=34' title='William Hill' target="_blank">William Hill</a> (Ayr) Gold Cup<br />
(Heritage Handicap) (CLASS 2) (3yo+) 6f</p>
<p>11/2 Poet&#8217;s Place, 7/1 Hawkeyethenoo, 8/1 Victoire De Lyphar 10/1 Genki,  12/1 Jonny Mudball, Redford, 14/1 Evens And Odds 16/1 Tajneed, 16/1  Rileyskeepingfaith, 16/1 Hitchens 20/1 Kaldoun Kingdom, 20/1 Jimmy  Styles, 20/1 Knot In Wood 20/1 Signor Peltro, 20/1 Noverre To Go, 25/1  Damien 25/1 Parisian Pyramid, 25/1 Striking Spirit, 25/1 Partner 25/1  Prime Exhibit, Barney McGrew, 33/1 Castles In The Air 33/1 Quest For  Success, 33/1 Flipando, 33/1 Damika<br />
33/1 Arganil, 33/1 Johannes</p>
<p>* The Ayr Gold Cup is a 6f Handicap<br />
* There has been 18 renewals of this race since 1992<br />
* I have used the 18 renewals of this race<br />
* I have used 156 similar Class 2 handicaps<br />
* These 156 races came between August and October</p>
<p>THE DRAW</p>
<p>Most are saying High. It is the safest choice. Nobody has any clue.<br />
They were saying &#8220;High&#8221; last year yet the low numbers had it in the 3 Gold Silver and Bronze Cup races.<br />
Even if there is a bias some belive the pace of the race matters more.<br />
I dont have a strong view. My research is based on Handicaps only at<br />
Ayr at this trip and I looked at every Handicap here since 2003 with 15 or more runners.<br />
What that tells me is Stall 1 has a poor record. It also tells me horses drawn 23 or higher are 1-85 and I<br />
would be very wary about the very high draws. Overall though I intend to ignore the draw at this stage and see what looks best.</p>
<p>NEGATIVES</p>
<p>* VICTOIRE DE LYPHAR is a Negative for me<br />
* He is 3 and has just 3 runs this year and a 50 day break<br />
* There were 2 winners aged 3 in this race<br />
* They both had twice as many runs this year as he does<br />
* August-September-October has seen 156 of these races<br />
* Horses aged 3 with 1-2-3 runs that season were 1-82<br />
* Those with 5 + runs had a 0-69 record and he has 9 runs<br />
* Horses aged 3 with 1-2-3 runs that season were 3-153<br />
* Those absent a month with 5 + career runs were 0-50<br />
* They say he is a Group horse. He will need to be<br />
* Drawn 24 may not be the help some think it is<br />
* VICTOIRE DE LYPHAR doesnt come out well enough<br />
* August-September-October has seen 156 of these races<br />
* Horses aged 8 or more struggle in these races<br />
* They won 7 races in a 7-275 record<br />
* None were absent more than a month<br />
* KNOT IN WOOD fails that<br />
* Those aged 8 or more with under 8 runs that year are 1-104<br />
* KNOT IN WOOD fails that as well<br />
* FLIPANDO is too old aged 9 to be dropping from 7f<br />
* BARNEY MCGREW is all wrong aged 7 from a Group 1 race<br />
* TAJNEED is 7 and has not run in 2 weeks<br />
* Horses with that profile were 6-255<br />
* Those with under 8 runs that season were 0-120<br />
* TAJNEED only just fails that with 7 runs but he fails it<br />
* Those without Group Class form were 0-86<br />
* TAJNEED also lacks Group class form as well<br />
* Horses aged 7 winning 2+ weeks ago were 0-18<br />
* TAJNEED has an unsatisfactory profile<br />
* He is a Ripon specialist and has a career high mark<br />
* Since 1986 horses aged 7 or more are 1-100 in this race<br />
* DAMIKA is 7 and has to come from a 7f race<br />
* There were 2 winners in 156 races doing that<br />
* Those beaten more than 4 + lengths last time were 0-45<br />
* He has a career high mark and this may be too much for him<br />
* JOHANNES is underraced for a 7 year old<br />
* Drawn one I will be shocked if he wins this<br />
* August-September-October has seen 156 of these races<br />
* Exposed horses absent over a month have a weak 5-297 record<br />
* In this race these horses have a 0-60 record<br />
* Those without Group class form were just 1-125<br />
* KALDOUN KINGDOM fails this and looks weak<br />
* EVENS AND ODDS is exposed and absent a month<br />
* Horses in this race with that profile were 0-60<br />
* In 156 similar races they were 5-297 but none like him<br />
* Those that placed 1-2-3 last time out were 0-69<br />
* JIMMY STYLES is exposed absent over a month<br />
* It worries me he has just 4 runs this season<br />
* RILEYSKEEPINGFAITH is exposed and absent over a month<br />
* No 4 year olds were exposed and absent as long as that<br />
* RILEYSKEEPINGFAITH looks unsafe to me<br />
* I looked at 156 similar races in August-September-October<br />
* Horses from Group races had a 2-60 record<br />
* None were aged 6 or more like GENKI<br />
* Exposed horses trying this were 1-38<br />
* None were as lightly raced this season as he is<br />
* He is trying to do what Advanced did in 2007<br />
* Thats to come from the Haydock Group 1 sprint<br />
* Advanced was an unexposed 4 year old though<br />
* I cant match GENKI to any of the 156 winners<br />
* He has a tough weight of 9st 8lbs to overcome<br />
* Horses in this race with 9st 7lbs or more struggled<br />
* Those with 13 + runs and that weight were 0-58<br />
* GENKI doesnt appeal much to me<br />
* CASTLES IN THE AIR is exposed and from a 7f Listed race<br />
* He looks unsafe and I cant find a winner like him<br />
* QUEST FOR SUCCESS is an exposed 5yo<br />
* He has no Group form and comes from a 6f handicap<br />
* Horses doing that within 2 weeks had a 1-85 record<br />
* That winner ran much better than he did last time<br />
* He also had much less weight and more runs this year<br />
* QUEST FOR SUCCESS doesnt come out like any winners<br />
* STRIKING SPIRIT has exactly the same profile<br />
* I see him as weak as well<br />
* HAWKEYETHENOO has been absent 56 days<br />
* I looked at 156 similar races in August-September-October<br />
* Horses absent 7 weeks or more like him were 11-265<br />
* Those that were exposed were 1-110<br />
* HAWKEYETHENOO fails that as he is exposed<br />
* The only winner managing it was older<br />
* He had more backclass as well<br />
* In 156 races last time winners with 13 + runs won 58 races<br />
* None were absent 7 weeks or more like him (0-32)<br />
* Those absent over a Month were only 1-104<br />
* That winner was an unexposed 4 year old<br />
* HAWKEYETHENOO doesnt look right to me<br />
* PARISIAN PYRAMID is an exposed 4yo<br />
* He has no form higher than Class 2 and hasnt run in 2 weeks<br />
* In 156 races horses with that profile were 2-74<br />
* Those like him beaten last time were 0-64<br />
* I cant match him to any of the 156 winners<br />
* PARTNER is difficult to read coming from Ireland<br />
* He is an unexposed 4yo absent over a month<br />
* There were 3 winners like that in 156 races<br />
* Those beaten 4 + lengths with that profile were 0-34<br />
*  PARTNER hasnt really shown enough to consider<br />
* HITCHENS is an exposed 5 year old<br />
* He won a 6f Handicap last time out<br />
* Horses with that profile had a 0-26 record<br />
* Exposed 5 year olds that were 1-2-3 last time were 6-157<br />
* Those with under 9 runs that season were 1-77<br />
* Those with under 7 runs that season were 0-41<br />
* HITCHENS only has 5 runs and is poor<br />
* DAMIEN is an unexposed 4yo from a 7f handicap<br />
* 2 of the 156 winners had that profile<br />
* Neither of them won this race<br />
* Neither had form in Group class before like him<br />
* I didnt see enough I liked about him</p>
<p>POSSIBLES</p>
<p>* SIGNOR PELTRO is a 7yo<br />
* Since 1986 horses aged 7 or more are 1-100 in this race<br />
* I looked at 156 similar races in August-September-October<br />
* Horses aged 7 or more from 6f handicaps in a month won races<br />
* Those with No form in Group Class races were 6-141<br />
* Those with under 9 runs that season were 1-62<br />
* SIGNOR PELTRO just lacks enough runs this year<br />
* He has a career high mark of 100 as well<br />
* I dont think he will win but I feel he is a Possible<br />
* ARGANIL looks shortlistable at a huge price<br />
* He is hard to fancy admittedy<br />
* He was only beaten 4.5 lengths in this race last year<br />
* This year he has a better preparation and a lower mark<br />
* ARANGIL is very similar to the 33/1 winner in 2004<br />
* He came from well beaten in the Portland<br />
* He also had Group form and was the same age<br />
* ARANGIL has to be shortlisted at a big price<br />
* His biggest problem may be his draw in stall 2<br />
* PRIME EXHIBIT has a complicated profile<br />
* I found 2 winners of similar races but none of this race<br />
* 5 year olds with 13-20 runs and an absence of 7 + weeks<br />
* I cant make him a negative so I&#8217;d shortlisting him<br />
* REDFORD comes from an 8f race<br />
* In 156 of these races there were 3 winners doing that<br />
* 2 of them came in this race as well<br />
* However they were all unexposed<br />
* Exposed horses like REDFORD from 8f races were 0-40<br />
* The horses from 8f races in this race were aged 3 and 4<br />
* REDFORD is 5 and I cant match him to a winner<br />
* With 1 run less I could so I would respect him<br />
* POET´S PLACE is very hard to assess<br />
* Being 5 with only 7 career starts makes him tricky to read<br />
* Horses with that profile won 3 races<br />
* Those with No Group class form had a 1-1 record<br />
* That winner had less weight and a long absence<br />
* He didnt win last time either<br />
* 2 Portland winners have won this race<br />
* They were both younger though confusing things more<br />
* Overall I would play on the safe side and shortlist him<br />
* NOVERRE TO GO comes from the Stewards Cup<br />
* There were 2 winners of this race doing that<br />
* Both were unexposed 4 year olds like him<br />
* They had 10 and 11 runs and he has 16 runs<br />
* Thats close enough for me<br />
* Unexposed 4 year olds won this race 6 times<br />
* 2 of the last 3 winners were unexposed 4 year olds<br />
* With fast ground NOVERRE TO GO could go close</p>
<p>STRONG PROFILE</p>
<p>JONNY MUDBALL</p>
<p>* JONNY MUDBALL has a very smart profile<br />
* JONNY MUDBALL is 4 and absent 49 days<br />
* 4 year olds absent over a Month won 9 races<br />
* Those with 7-12 runs like him won 5 races<br />
* Those with Class 2 form made that a 5-14 record<br />
* Extract those that were not beaten 4 + lengths last time<br />
* Those that came from a 6f handicap had a 4-5 record<br />
* Those that started under 33/1 had a 4-4 record<br />
* Horses with his profile had a 4-4 record<br />
* The 1996 and 2001 winners of this race had this profile<br />
* They both came from the Stewards cup like him<br />
* He is very similar to 1996 winner Coastal Bluff</p>
<p>Find Current Best Odds at<br />
<a href="http://mathematician-betting.bestbetting.com/horse-racing/2010-09-18/ayr/15-20/betting/" target="_blank">http://mathematician-betting.bestbetting.com/horse-racing/2010-09-18/ayr/15-20/betting/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/ayr-gold-cup-tip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

