<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sports betting blog &#187; Grade 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/tag/grade-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk</link>
	<description>sports betting blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Scottish Grand National</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/scottish-grand-national/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/scottish-grand-national/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[6f]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheltenham Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurdles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outsiders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Winners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Season 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Out]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=1072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AYR 3.25
Coral Scottish Grand National Handicap Chase
(Grade 3) (CLASS 1) (5yo+) 4m110y
* The Scottish National is a 4m Handicap Chase
* I would avoid all horses that ran in the Grand National
* You have to go back to 1987 for the last One to win
* Over 80 horses have since tried and failed
* Every past winner [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AYR 3.25</p>
<p><a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=67' title='Coral' target="_blank">Coral</a> Scottish Grand National Handicap Chase<br />
(Grade 3) (CLASS 1) (5yo+) 4m110y</p>
<p>* The Scottish National is a 4m Handicap Chase<br />
* I would avoid all horses that ran in the Grand National<br />
* You have to go back to 1987 for the last One to win<br />
* Over 80 horses have since tried and failed<br />
* Every past winner had at least 3 runs that season<br />
* Previous winners had the following runs that season<br />
* 3 5 4 4 5 6 5 5 6 6 6 7 5 3 5<br />
* I would want at least 3 and no more than 7 runs<br />
* Horses that Fell or Pulled Up last time are 0-116<br />
* You want some Experience over fences.<br />
* The recent winners had the following Chase runs<br />
* 10 16 13 10 19 6 24 21 14 14 5 9 10<br />
* Since 1998 the 1st 2nd and 3rds that these chase runs<br />
* 10 13 9 10 10 11 16 19 10 14 6 5 5 24 19 20 21 18<br />
* 14 10 16 14 9 8 14 8 11 5 10 15 9 18 27 10 10 17<br />
* No horse won or placed with fewer than 5 Chase starts.<br />
* Horses aged 7 have a weak 1-50 record<br />
* All exposed horses that won had Graded form before<br />
* All exposed horses came from 2m 7f or further<br />
* Horses from Novice Chases are 0-21<br />
* Horses from the Cheltenham Festival had a poor 2-80 record<br />
* None have won since 1997<br />
* No horse placed at the Cheltenham festival has won this race<br />
* No exposed horse came from the Cheltenham festival to win<br />
* The only winners were unexposed horses with Grade 1 form<br />
* They both had only 10st weight as well<br />
* Horses coming from 2m 6f or shorter struggled<br />
* Only 1 past winner did that and he had a run within a week<br />
* No winners came from Hurdles<br />
* Horses aged 11 or more were 3-81<br />
* With horses this age I&#8217;d want at least 5 runs that season<br />
* They all ran within 7 weeks and had 11st or less<br />
* 11 of the last 12 winners ran within 60 days<br />
* 7 of the last 9 winners had 10st 6lbs or less<br />
* Horses rated 150 or more have a 0-16 record in this<br />
* The last 11 winners were all 1-2-3-4-5-6 last time out</p>
<p>I came down to 4 horses to consider.<br />
Outsiders BALLYFITZ and REGAL HEIGHTS do have reasonable profiles.<br />
I see MINELLA FOUR STAR and<br />
ALWAYS RIGHT as having every chance as well.<br />
It would be easy to go with ALWAYS RIGHT but perhaps as a saver<br />
with <strong>MINELLA FOUR STAR</strong> the main choice of the pair.</p>
<p>Guy</p>
<p>============</p>
<p>This was provided by Guy Ward of <a href="http://www.horse-betting-blog.co.uk">Horse Betting Blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/scottish-grand-national/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aintree Trends and Statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/aintree-trends-and-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/aintree-trends-and-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 08:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheltenham Festival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decent Effort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favourites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurdle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Least Four Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negative Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Nicholls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scrutiny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Season 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=1061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
 
The below comes from Dave over at Racing Trends.
Stats are based on ten years historical data.
You can read more from Dave at this link  Horse Racing Blog
Saturday
 
1.45 John Smith’s Mersey Novices’ Hurdle 2m4f
POSITIVE TRENDS
 



Market: 7 of the last 10 winners started in the first two of   the betting. Second [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>The below comes from Dave over at Racing Trends.</p>
<p>Stats are based on ten years historical data.</p>
<p>You can read more from Dave at this link  <a href="http://www.racingtrends.co.uk/racing/">Horse Racing Blog</a></p>
<p><strong>Saturday</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>1.45 John Smith’s </strong><strong>Mersey</strong><strong> Novices’ Hurdle 2m4f</strong></p>
<p>POSITIVE TRENDS</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Market: </strong>7 of the last 10 winners started in the first two of   the betting. Second favourites have won 5 races (PROFIT of £14.08; ROI   +156.4%).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Price: </strong>7 of the last 10 winners were priced 9/2 or shorter.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Position LTO: </strong>8 of the last 10 winners finished in the first four   LTO.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>LTO race:</strong> 5 of the last 10 winners ran in the Cheltenham   Festival and all 5 had finished sixth or better.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Races in current season: </strong>8 of the last 10 winners had run at   least 4 times that season.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Trainers: </strong>Paul Nicholls has had five runners and 3 have won (1   placed).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>NEGATIVE TRENDS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Price 20/1+: </strong>0 wins from 44 (only 3 placed).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Beaten distance LTO: </strong>Horses beaten 15 or more lengths LTO have provided 0   winners from 27 runners (only 2 placed).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>GENERAL STATS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Favourites (inc.   joints):</strong> 2 wins from 11.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Finishing positions of   favourites:</strong> 5, 2, F, 4, 3, 1/2, 5,   3, 5, 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Age: </strong>8 of the last 10 winners were aged 5 or 6 (although   they made up 66% of the runners).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Trends Summary: <em>5 and   6yos dominate the race but they do provide the majority of the runners.   Second favourites have performed very well winning half the races, while a   decent effort at </em></strong><strong><em>Cheltenham</em></strong><strong><em> LTO is another positive. Most of the winners had   run at least four times that season which is a further positive to bear in   mind. Paul Nicholls has a good record in the race so any runner from the   stable requires close scrutiny.</em></strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
<br/><br/><br />
<strong>2.15 Maghull Novices’ Chase (Grade 1) 2m</strong></p>
<p>POSITIVE TRENDS</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Recent form: </strong>8 of the last 10 winners finished in the first three   LTO.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Race LTO: </strong>8 of the last 10 winners ran in the Arkle Chase at Cheltenham.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Price: </strong>All of the last 10 winners were priced 6/1 or   shorter (9 winners were 4/1 or shorter).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Market: </strong>9 of the last 10 winners were first or second in the   betting. Second favourites have won 6 renewals (PROFIT of £12.33; ROI   +112.1%).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Breeding: </strong>5 of the last 10 winners were French bred (6 others   were placed).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Trainers: </strong>Paul Nicholls has had 4 winners in the past 10   renewals (5 in last 12).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>NEGATIVE TRENDS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Price 13/2+: </strong>0 wins from 43 (only 4 placed).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Breeding: </strong>British bred runners have provided 0 winners from 16   with only 1 placed runner.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>GENERAL STATS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Favourites (inc.   joints): </strong>3 wins, 6 seconds from 10.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Finishing positions of   favourites:</strong> 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1,   2, 2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Trends Summary: <em>The   best starting point is to look for horses that ran in the Arkle Chase LTO as   they have provided 80% of the winners from around 50% of the total runners.   The market has been a very strong indicator also with no winner priced over   6/1. Indeed there have been 9 winners priced 4/1 or shorter. In terms of   breeding Feench breds definitely have an edge while British bred runners have   struggled. Paul Nicholls has a good record in the race.</em></strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
<br/><br/><br />
<strong>2.50 John Smith’s Aintree Hurdle (Grade 1) 2m 4f</strong></p>
<p>POSITIVE TRENDS</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Recent form: </strong>5 of the last 10 winners finished out of the frame /   fell LTO.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Price: </strong>All of the last 10 winners were priced 12/1 or   shorter.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Trainers: </strong>6 of the last 10 winners (60%) were trained in Ireland. Irish raiders have accounted for only a quarter of   the total runners).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Jockeys: </strong>Ruby Walsh has had 3 wins from 6 rides in the race;   Timmy Murphy has had 3 wins from 8.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>NEGATIVE TRENDS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Headgear:</strong> 0 wins from 25 runners for horses with any type of   headgear (blinkers, visor, cheekpieces, tongue ties).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Price 14/1+: </strong>0 wins from 47 (4 placed).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>GENERAL STATS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Favourites (inc.   joints):</strong> 2 wins from 12, but 5   others have finished second.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Finishing positions of   favourites:</strong> 2, 7, 2, 1/2, F, 2, 10,   1/2, 4, 3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Breeding:</strong> Irish bred runners do have a slight edge having won   6 races (60%) from 40% of the total runners.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Trends Summary: <em>Horses   priced 12/1 or shorter have dominated the race while a good run LTO is not a   necessity. Irish runners have an outstanding record in the race not just in   the last 10 years but stretching back to the mid 70s. Irish breds perform   above the norm, while horses wearing headgear have a poor record.</em></strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
<br/><br/><br />
<strong>3.25 John Smith’s Handicap Chase 3m 1f</strong></p>
<p>POSITIVE TRENDS</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Class: </strong>9 of the last 10 winnershad raced in Graded company   in their careers.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Recent wins: </strong>9 of the last 10 winners had won at least one of   their last six starts.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Position LTO: </strong>6 of the last 10 winners finished in the first three   LTO.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Trainers: </strong>Jonjo O’Neill has won the race 3 times (4 if you go   back an extra year); Nicky Henderson has won the race twice.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Running style: </strong>Hold up horses have done well in this race with 6   wins from the last 10 renewals.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>NEGATIVE TRENDS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Course winners:</strong> Course winners are 0 from 25 with just 3 placed.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Career starts:</strong> Horses that had raced 25 times or more in their   careers have provided just 1 win from 47 (LOSS of £41.50; ROI -88.3%).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>LTO run: </strong>Horses that failed to finish on their previous start   have provided 0 winners from 31.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>GENERAL STATS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Favourites (inc.   joints): </strong>2 wins from 11 for a small   loss.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Finishing positions of   favourites:</strong> P, 1, 3, 5, 2, 4/P, 1,   F, PU, 4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Course LTO: </strong>6 of the 10 winners ran at the Cheltenham Festival   LTO from 60 runners (SR 10%); horses that did not race at the festival have   provided 4 winners from 93 (SR 4.3%).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Trends Summary: <em>Not   the strongest races of the meeting as far as trends are concerned. It is best   to focus on horses that have won at least once in their last six runs, and   have run in Graded company at some point in their careers. Any horses trained   by Jonjo O’Neill needs close scrutiny, while Nicky </em></strong><strong><em>Henderson</em></strong><strong><em> has a decent record also. In terms of negatives,   avoid horses that have 25 times or more in their careers and/or any horse   that failed to finish LTO. Finally, horses that ran at the </em></strong><strong><em>Cheltenham</em></strong><strong><em> festival have a much better chance of winning than   those that did not.</em></strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
<br/><br/><br />
<strong>4.15 John Smith’s Grand National (handicap chase) – 4m 4f</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>POSITIVE TRENDS</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Price: </strong>7 of the last 10 winners have been priced 20/1 or   shorter. Hence 70% of the winners have come from 29% of the runners.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Winning form:</strong> All of the last 10 winners had previously won over   3 miles or further – this stat holds true right back to 1970.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Age: </strong>9 and 10yos have provided 7 of the last 10 winners   (70%) from just under 50% of the runners.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Weight: </strong>9 of the last 10 winners carried 11st 1lb or less.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Breeding: </strong>8 of the last 10 winners were Irish bred.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>NEGATIVE TRENDS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Age:</strong> 8yo or younger have won just 1 from 96 runners.   (7yos or younger are 0 from 30 and none have finished in the first four –   indeed 23 have failed to complete the course). 13yo and older runners are   rare but all 10 have been soundly beaten.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Price 40/1+: </strong>1 win from 188 qualifiers.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Headgear: </strong>Horses wearing blinkers or visors have produced 1   win from 55, with 3 further finishing placed (LOSS of £47.00; ROI -85.5%).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>GENERAL STATS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Favourites (inc.   joints): </strong>3 wins from 20.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Finishing positions of   favourites:</strong> F/F/BD, 3, PU,   2/F/U/PU, 1, 2/3, F/PU/R, 1/6, 7, 1/4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Trainers: </strong>4 of the last 10 winners were trained in Ireland.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong><em>Trends Summary: Mon   Mome was a shock 100/1 winner two years ago but overall big priced runners   should be ignored. One stat that goes back to 1970 is concerned with the fact   that all winners had won over 3 miles or further in their careers. Irish   trainers deserve respect also as they have provided 40% of the winners from   less than 20% of the total runners. In terms of weight, horses carrying   bigger weights (11st 2lb or more) have a poor record although Don’t Push It   bucked the trend last year carrying 11st 5lb to victory. In terms of age it   looks best to avoid horses aged 8 or younger. </em></strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
<br/><br/><br />
<strong>4.55 John Smith’s Handicap Hurdle (Listed) 2m ½f </strong></p>
<p>POSITIVE TRENDS</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Price: </strong>9 of the last 10 winners were priced between 7/1 and   20/1.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Weight: </strong>9 of the last 10 winners carried 10st 10lb or less.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>NEGATIVE TRENDS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Favourites: </strong>0 wins from 10.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Market: </strong>The top three in the betting have provided 0   winners.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Official ratings: </strong>Horses with an OR of 133 or more have provided 1   winner from 43 (LOSS of £31.00; ROI -72.1%).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Weights: </strong>The top seven in the weights have provided only 2   winners from 74.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Trainers: </strong>The Pipe stable have saddled 22 runners but 0 winners   (only 3 placed).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>GENERAL STATS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Finishing positions of   favourites:</strong> 2, 15, F, 2, 13, 15, 8,   PU, 18, 8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Age:</strong> 6 of the last 10 winners were aged 5 or 6 (16 out   of the last 20 going back a further 10 years). However, they do make up a   fair proportion of the total runners.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Trends Summary: <em>On   the face of it there seem to be limited trends, but horses carrying 10st 10lb   or less that are priced between 7/1 and 20/1 is a starting point at least. </em></strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
<br/><br/><br />
<strong>5.30 Champion Standard National Hunt Flat Race 2m 1f</strong></p>
<p>The race was not run in 2007 so I have gone back an extra year.</p>
<p>POSITIVE TRENDS</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Season’s form: </strong>8 of the last 10 winners had won at least once that   season.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Market: </strong>6 of the last 10 winners have been priced 25/1 or   bigger.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Age: </strong>6yos have a decent record with 5 wins from 38   (PROFIT of £104.25; ROI +274.3%).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>NEGATIVE TRENDS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Market: </strong>Horses from the top 8 of the betting have won just 3   of the 10 races.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Age: </strong>Horses aged 4 have provided just 1 winner from 59   (LOSS £44.00; ROI -74.6%).</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>GENERAL STATS</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Favourites (inc.   joints): </strong>2 wins, 3 placed from 11.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Finishing positions of   favourites:</strong> 8, 1, 1, 14, 3, 4, 4,   3/20, 2, 19</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><strong>Trends Summary: <em>With   the last 5 of the last 7 winners having been priced 25/1 or bigger this is   not an easy finale. 6yos have a good record having won 50% of the races from   19% of the total runners. So a big priced 6yo is probably the value call.</em></strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.racingtrends.co.uk/">www.RacingTrends.co.uk</a><br/><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/aintree-trends-and-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Pick The Gold Cup Winner</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/how-to-pick-the-gold-cup-winner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/how-to-pick-the-gold-cup-winner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 12:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bare Minimum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carruthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheltenham Gold Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cup Winner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Cup Winners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imperial Commander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Autumn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neptune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recent Winners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revelation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird Al]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=1049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After timing this I know but there is still opportunity to learn from succesfull race analysis.
This was one of the better Gold Cup bits of analysis I read.
Guy seems to have  a bit of knack for the Gold Cup as he made a very good and reasoned case for Imperial Commander at 8/1 when he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After timing this I know but there is still opportunity to learn from succesfull race analysis.</p>
<p>This was one of the better Gold Cup bits of analysis I read.</p>
<p>Guy seems to have  a bit of knack for the Gold Cup as he made a very good and reasoned case for Imperial Commander at 8/1 when he won last year.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>CHELTENHAM 3.20</p>
<p><a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=38' title='Tote' target="_blank">Tote</a>sport Cheltenham Gold Cup Chase<br />
Grade 1 (CLASS  1) (5yo+) 3m2f110y</p>
<p>100/30 Imperial Commander, 9/2 Long Run<br />
5/1 Kauto  Star, 11/2 Denman, 11/1 Kempes<br />
12/1 Pandorama, 14/1 Midnight Chase<br />
20/1  Tidal Bay, 20/1 Weird Al, 25/1 Albertas Run<br />
25/1 China Rock, 33/1 Neptune  Collonges<br />
33/1 What A Friend, 66/1 Carruthers.</p>
<p>* The Gold Cup is a  Grade 1 Chase over 3m 2f110y<br />
* Like many I want to oppose the old guard<br />
*  KAUTO STAR and DENMAN are opposed<br />
* Both are now 11 year olds<br />
* No Gold  Cup winner was that age since 1969<br />
* I take the view both are now vulnerable  to improvers<br />
* DENMAN especially looks weak with just 1 run this season<br />
*  KAUTO STAR only has 2 runs and doesnt appeal<br />
* I would have to oppose this  ageing pair<br />
* PANDORAMA doesnt look safe to me<br />
* You ideally want between  6 and 14 Chase starts<br />
* PANDORAMA has had just 5 and pulled up early in  one<br />
* He has ran just twice this year which is a bare minimum<br />
* Having  Pulled up early in one of those races I&#8217;d worry<br />
* PANDORAMA lacks form at the  track as well<br />
* Short on experience it&#8217;s not a Gold Cup winners profile<br />
*  MIDNIGHT CHASE has been a revelation last Autumn<br />
* He comes from a Handicap  and 2 recent winners did that<br />
* That said both those winners had Grade 1 Form  before<br />
* Every winner since 1992 won or placed in a Grade 1-2 race<br />
*  MIDNIGHT CHASE has never ran in that class before<br />
* Rated 163 without that  form I&#8217;d question his class<br />
* Coming from a Handicap before Christmass won&#8217;t  help<br />
* The form of that win has hardly worked out<br />
* With the National in  mind I think he will be found out<br />
* CHINA ROCK looks outclassed<br />
* NEPTUNE  COLLONGES doesnt appeal much either<br />
* CARRUTHERS has shown this race is too  much for him<br />
* WEIRD AL only has 5 Chase starts<br />
* That would make him the  least experienced winner in ages<br />
* I dont like him with 2 runs this year and  a break</p>
<p>POSSIBLES</p>
<p>* KEMPES was impressive in Ireland last  time<br />
* He is peaking and could offer more improvment<br />
* Unusual type as he  started his career on the Flat<br />
* The last winner to do that was back in  1979<br />
* Thats not a good sign and makes him harder to fancy<br />
* So to does  the lack of form at Cheltenham<br />
* One run here over Hurdles and well beaten in  that<br />
* His rating is just below the class usually required<br />
* He will  probably run well without winning<br />
* WHAT A FRIEND doesnt look a likely  winner<br />
* His profile is too good for a 40/1 chance though<br />
* His rating  suggests he isnt good enough and he may not be<br />
* It wouldnt be a complete  shock if he won though</p>
<p>SHORTLIST</p>
<p>TIDAL BAY<br />
IMPERIAL  COMMANDER<br />
LONG RUN</p>
<p>* IMPERIAL COMMANDER is the reigning Champion<br />
*  He has had just 1 run this year in a very light season<br />
* His trainer has  recently quashed that saying he will win<br />
* He does have a brilliant record  Fresh<br />
* Winning last year and going well fresh gets him shortlisted<br />
* He  is 10 now and thats older than ideal<br />
* I ignore that statistic as its a race  full of older horses<br />
* He is still ideally exposed with 12 Chase starts<br />
*  I&#8217;d have liked one more run this year but I like his chance<br />
* I think he is  one of 3 with outstanding claims</p>
<p>* TIDAL BAY deserves to take his  chance<br />
* He is high class and should be suited to the race<br />
* Statistically  he is older than ideal aged 10<br />
* There has been a 10yo winner and plenty  placed<br />
* I wouldnt rule him out based on that statistic alone<br />
* Not with  so many others with bigger problems<br />
* After all 3 or the 4 market leaders are  that age and more<br />
* You want 6-14 Chase runs<br />
* He has had 16 Chase runs  and thats only 2 more than ideal<br />
* He has never Fallen over fences in his  life<br />
* He has a consistent record as well over fences<br />
* TIDAL BAY looks  outstanding value at 22/1</p>
<p>* LONG RUN is clearly Top Class and good  enough<br />
* The issue is whether he is good enough at the track<br />
* He is 6 and  the last 6yo winner was 1948<br />
* It&#8217;s not that relevant as hardly any have  tried<br />
* Those that did included The Fellow beaten in a photo<br />
* One think I  would mention is that he is not technically 6<br />
* He wont become 6 until April  unofficially<br />
* The Fellow was 4 months older than he is<br />
* I see him as  easily shortlistable and in the 1-2-3<br />
* I dont like the fact he is not  actually a full 6yo yet<br />
* There is also the track and many say he doesnt like  it<br />
* I find that ridiculous after evidence of just 2 races<br />
* Far too early  to write him off at all<br />
* His run in last years Sun Alliance was  excusable<br />
* He was statistically Repulsive in that race<br />
* His chance was  never as good as it was portrayed<br />
* I have to forgive him that run and he did  place<br />
* In the Sun Alliance last year he was inexperienced<br />
* Two days ago  we opposed Time For Rupert in the RSA<br />
* He had a better statistical profile  than Long Run last year<br />
* LONG RUN had 2 runs and Time For Rupert 3<br />
* LONG  RUN also came from 2m to 3m last year<br />
* Time For Rupert didnt have to go up  in trip<br />
* LONG RUN was also a 5yo last year in that race<br />
* There are just  2 winners aged 5 since 1946 in the RSA<br />
* LONG RUN didnt have the allowances  they had<br />
* His run in 3rd last year was nothing short of magnificent<br />
*  Thats the stick many are beating him with this year<br />
* His other defeat here  was first time out this year<br />
* That wasnt too bad a run either on his  debut<br />
* He demands the benefit of the doubt</p>
<p>SELECTION</p>
<p>LONG  RUN 5/1 Win Bet</p>
<p>TIDAL BAY 22/1 + Win Bet</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk">www.mathematician-betting.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/how-to-pick-the-gold-cup-winner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Hunt Horse Racing Statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/national-hunt-horse-racing-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/national-hunt-horse-racing-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 12:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alfie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dark Shadow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurdle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kilmurry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Caine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Hunt Horse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novice Beginner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O Neill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O Toole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riverside Theatre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sherrin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sire Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trainer Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warwick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National Hunt Horse Racing Statistics
As Michael Caine would say ..&#8221;not a lot of people know that&#8221; 
Knowing more than most is a great position to be in when making betting decissions.
The info below is a snippet from todays message from Dave Renham&#8217;s RacingTrends Service.
It is a mere snippet.
His full message coantains much much more about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>National Hunt Horse Racing Statistics</strong></p>
<p>As Michael Caine would say ..&#8221;not a lot of people know that&#8221;<strong> </strong></p>
<p>Knowing more than most is a great position to be in when making betting decissions.</p>
<p>The info below is a snippet from todays message from Dave Renham&#8217;s <a href="http://www.racingtrends.co.uk">RacingTrends Service</a>.</p>
<p>It is a mere snippet.</p>
<p>His full message coantains much much more about favourite stats, trainer stats and draw bias etc.</p>
<p>RacignTrends is well worth a look if you are thinking punter who likes to do your own thing instead of blindly following tips. You will find Dave&#8217;s research a  great aid giving you racing insights most others do not have access to.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>POSITIVE STATS &#8211;  (TRAINER / SIRE / DRAW)</strong></p>
<p>Please note &#8211; some are  price** or going* dependent</p>
<p>4.30    Ayr &#8211; <strong>King  Sandor **</strong>: Positive Sire Stats &#8211; King&#8217;s Theatre NH racing must be top 2 in  the betting SR 34% ROI +14%) (win &amp; pl 62%)</p>
<p>1.20    Newbury &#8211; <strong>Oasis  Knight</strong>: N Henderson &#8211; hurdle races; off track for 6 months or more; class 2  or lower; SR 34% ROI +46% (win &amp; pl 54%)</p>
<p>2.25    Newbury &#8211;  <strong>Riverside Theatre **</strong>: Positive Sire Stats &#8211; King&#8217;s Theatre NH racing must  be top 2 in the betting SR 34% ROI +14%) (win &amp; pl 62%)</p>
<p>3.35    Newbury &#8211; <strong>Tiger  O&#8217;toole **</strong>: Positive Sire Stats &#8211; King&#8217;s Theatre NH racing must be top 2 in  the betting SR 34% ROI +14%) (win &amp; pl 62%)</p>
<p>2.40    Warwick &#8211;  <strong>Kilmurry **</strong>: Positive Sire Stats &#8211; King&#8217;s Theatre NH racing must be top 2  in the betting SR 34% ROI +14%) (win &amp; pl 62%)</p>
<p>3.45    Warwick &#8211; <strong>Alfie  Sherrin **</strong>: J O&#8217;Neill &#8211; novice/beginner chases must be priced 8/1 or  shorter; NOT Grade 1 tracks SR 31% ROI +19% (win &amp; pl 52%)</p>
<p>4.55    Warwick &#8211; <strong>Dark  Shadow</strong>: N Henderson &#8211; 4yos on debut SR 36% ROI +36% (win &amp; pl  57%)</p>
<p>4.55    Warwick &#8211;  <strong>Theatre Guide **</strong>: Positive Sire Stats &#8211; King&#8217;s Theatre NH racing must be  top 2 in the betting SR 34% ROI +14%) (win &amp; pl 62%)</p>
<p><strong> </strong> <strong>NEGATIVE  STATS</strong> -</p>
<p>Please note  &#8211; some are price** or going* dependent</p>
<p>5.05    Ayr &#8211;  <strong>Glengap</strong>: Poor Sire Stats &#8211; Needle Gun in hurdles races; SR 4% ROI -74%  (win &amp; pl 21%)</p>
<p>4.05    Newbury &#8211;  <strong>Jokers Legacy **</strong>: Poor Trainer Stat &#8211; T Vaughan &#8211; horses wearing  headgear; must be 3rd or bigger in the betting; SR 5% ROI -64% (win &amp; pl  20%)</p>
<p>4.40    Newbury &#8211; <strong>Star  Neuville **</strong>: Poor jockey stat &#8211; A Mc Coy in bumpers; horses MUST BE priced  5/1 or bigger SR 4% ROI -70% (win &amp; pl 19%) <strong> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/national-hunt-horse-racing-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>50/1 Winner At Newmarket?</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/501-winner-at-newmarket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/501-winner-at-newmarket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3 Year Old]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3 Year Olds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betfred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Angel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bookmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fillies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Stream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Group Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrison George]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ladbrokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Name Of The Game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shortlist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sir Gerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stan James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victor Chandler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[50/1 Winner At Newmarket?
A specualtive  long shot each way suggestion for newmarket today from The Mathematician. To visit his own site click here ==&#62; Horse Betting

&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-
NEWMARKET 1.50
Victor Chandler Challenge Stakes (Group 2)
(CLASS 1)  (3yo+) 7f
2/1 Delegator, 5/1 Red Jazz, 10/1 Mabait, 10/1 Main  Aim
12/1 Cat Junior, 12/1 Dream Eater, 16/1 High Standing
20/1 Duff, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>50/1 Winner At Newmarket?</strong></p>
<p>A specualtive  long shot each way suggestion for newmarket today from The Mathematician<strong>. </strong>To visit his own site click here ==&gt; <a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk" target="_blank">Horse Betting</a><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>NEWMARKET 1.50</p>
<p><a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=30' title='victor chandler' target="_blank">Victor Chandler</a> Challenge Stakes (Group 2)<br />
(CLASS 1)  (3yo+) 7f</p>
<p>2/1 Delegator, 5/1 Red Jazz, 10/1 Mabait, 10/1 Main  Aim<br />
12/1 Cat Junior, 12/1 Dream Eater, 16/1 High Standing<br />
20/1 Duff, 20/1  Himalya, Shakespearean, 25/1 Harrison George 25/1 Sir Gerry, 33/1 Golden Stream,  50/1 Blue Angel.</p>
<p>* The Challenge Stakes is a Group race over 7f<br />
*  There are 20 renewals since 1990<br />
* 18 of the 20 winners had between 9 and 14  career runs<br />
* Horses with 13 or more starts struggled<br />
* The only ones that  won had Grade 1 form before<br />
* Male 3 year olds are just 1-37 with 13 or more  runs<br />
* No 3 year old has won this down in distance</p>
<p>SHORTLIST</p>
<p>*  DELEGATOR has 1 run this season<br />
* A Few past winners had 2 runs but none had  1<br />
* Thats the biggest problem he faces<br />
* BLUE ANGEL has a surprisingly  good profile<br />
* She is very similar to the 2007 winner<br />
* She is  close to 2  other winners<br />
* In a race of shocks she could be interesting<br />
* 3 Year Old  fillies with 7-12 career starts<br />
* Finishing 1-2-3-4 last time<br />
* At least 6  runs this season<br />
* These horses had a 4-6 record in this race<br />
* The last 2  that won (2007 and 2000) were 20/1<br />
* BLUE ANGEL is a possibly shock   winner.</p>
<p>It looks a ridiculous shout to go with BLUE ANGLE who<br />
is 50/1  and more on <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=66' title='Betfair' target="_blank">Betfair</a> and multiple bookmakers but the last 10 renewals have<br />
seen horses win a 20/1 20/1  20/1 20/1 and 16/1 and they<br />
were impossible to find as well so she may be  able to nick<br />
a place. I&#8217;m not keen on any of the alternatives so with  a<br />
risk of making myself look stupid I will go with her.</p>
<p>Definately more chance of losing with this bet than winning with it but the name of the game is long term edge and at 50/1 I sniff some value.<br />
SELECTION</p>
<p>BLUE ANGEL 50/1 + Each  Way <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=1' title='bet365' target="_blank">Bet365</a> -  <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=53' title='betfred' target="_blank">Betfred</a> &#8211; <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=33' title='Ladbrokes' target="_blank">Ladbrokes</a> &#8211; <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=43' title='stan james' target="_blank">Stan James</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/501-winner-at-newmarket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doncaster Horse Racing Statisics</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/doncaster-horse-racing-statisics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/doncaster-horse-racing-statisics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shareapost</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favourites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Female Runners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Horse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negative Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Return On Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Female]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Horse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Of Horse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doncaster Horse Racing Statisics by Dave Renham

&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-
Dave offers a useful free guide to horse racing.
To get yours click here ==&#62; Horse Racing Course
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-
In this post I am looking at the Spring Mile, the Brocklesby and the Listed Cammidge sprint.
The trends and statistics are based on the last 15 renewals. All profits
and losses are quoted using [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Doncaster Horse Racing Statisics by Dave Renham<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p align="justify">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p align="justify">Dave offers a useful free guide to horse racing.</p>
<p align="justify">To get yours click here ==&gt; <a href="http://www.racingtrends.co.uk/free-horse-racing-course.php">Horse Racing Course</a></p>
<p align="justify">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p align="justify"><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">In this post I am looking at the Spring Mile, the Brocklesby and the Listed Cammidge sprint.<br />
The trends and statistics are based on the last 15 renewals. All profits<br />
and losses are quoted using £1 win stakes. ROI stands for return on<br />
investment; LTO stands for last time out; SR stands for strike rate.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;"><strong>2.00 Doncaster -<br />
Spring Mile – 1m class 2 (4yo+) </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">POSITIVE TRENDS </span></p>
<p><a name="0.1_table01"></a></p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="0" width="590">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Market: </strong><br />
Second, third and fourth favourites have provided 6 winners and backing<br />
all qualifiers would have produced a small profit of £12.50 (ROI +25%). </span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Course LTO: </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"> 9 of the 15 winners raced at a Grade 1 track LTO. They have provided<br />
60% of the winners from only 33% of the total runners. Backing all such<br />
runners would have produced a profit of £44.50 (ROI +40.5%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Age: </strong><br />
4yos have won 10 of the last 15 renewals. (67% of winners from 44% of<br />
the total runners).</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">NEGATIVE TRENDS </span></p>
<p><a name="0.1_table02"></a></p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="0" width="590">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Favourites: </strong><br />
1 win from 15 for a loss of £7.00 (ROI -46.7%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Price: </strong><br />
All runners priced 11/2 or shorter have been beaten (12 in total).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Price: </strong><br />
Horses priced 25/1 or bigger have provided just 1 winner from 122 qualifiers<br />
for a loss of £88.00 (ROI -72.1%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Distance LTO: </strong><br />
Horses that ran over 1m1f or more LTO have provided 0 winners from 78<br />
qualifiers.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Class LTO:</strong><br />
67 horses raced in the same class or higher LTO and all have lost.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Course LTO: </strong><br />
Horses that ran on the all weather LTO have provided just 3 winners<br />
from 155 runners for a loss of £108.00 (ROI -69.7%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Age: </strong><br />
Horses 7yos and older have provided 0 winners from 55.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">GENERAL STATS </span></p>
<p><a name="0.1_table03"></a></p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="0" width="590">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Position LTO: </strong><br />
Horses that finished 10<sup>th</sup> or worse LTO have won 7 of the<br />
races.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Sex of horse: </strong><br />
Female runners have a fair record with 3 wins from 31 for a profit of<br />
£22.00 (ROI +71%).</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><a name="0.1_table04"></a></p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="0" width="590">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong><em>Trends analysis:<br />
In general I would look to use the negative trends first to help narrow<br />
this big field down. Firstly ignore 7 year olds and older, then ignore<br />
and horses dropping in trip. All 15 winners raced in a lower class LTO<br />
and there should be preference for horses that ran at a Grade 1 track<br />
LTO. Also LTO form does not really seem to matter as nearly half the<br />
winners have won after finishing 10</em></strong><sup><strong><em>th</em></strong></sup><strong><em><br />
or worse LTO.</em></strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;"><strong>2.35 Doncaster -<br />
Cammidge Trophy – 6f Listed (3yo+) </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">POSITIVE TRENDS </span></p>
<p><a name="0.1_table05"></a></p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="0" width="590">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Price: </strong><br />
7 of the last 15 winners have been priced between 6/1 and 11/1. Backing<br />
all runners in this price bracket would have produced a profit of £14.50<br />
(ROI +26.9%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>LTO class: </strong><br />
Horses that raced in Listed class LTO have provided 8 of the last 15<br />
winners.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Days since last<br />
run: </strong>14 of the last 15 winners were having their first run of the<br />
year in the UK.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Running style: </strong><br />
In recent years horses that have raced up with or close to the pace<br />
have had a clear advantage providing 8 of the last 11 winners.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">NEGATIVE TRENDS </span></p>
<p><a name="0.1_table06"></a></p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="0" width="590">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>LTO class: </strong><br />
Horses that raced in class 3 company or lower LTO have provided 0 winners<br />
from 25 runners.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>LTO race type: </strong><br />
Horses that raced in an all age handicap LTO have provided just 1 winner<br />
from 65 for a loss of £50.00 (ROI -76.9%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>LTO course: </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"> Horses that raced on the all weather LTO have provided just 1 winner<br />
from 33 for a loss of £24.50 (ROI -74.2%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Headgear: </strong><br />
Horses wearing blinkers / visors have provided 0 winners from 24.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">GENERAL STATS </span></p>
<p><a name="0.1_table07"></a></p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="0" width="590">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Favourites (inc.<br />
joints): </strong>4 wins from 17 for a loss of £2.75 (ROI -16.2%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Age: </strong><br />
3yos have won 1 race from 9 (SR 11.1%); 4yos have won 4 races from 59<br />
(SR 6.8%); 5yos have won 4 races from 31 (SR 12.9%); 6yos have won 3<br />
races from 28 (SR 10.7%); 7yos have won 2 races from 23 (SR 8.7%); 8yos+<br />
have won 1 from 26 (SR 3.8%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Sex of horse:</strong><br />
Male runners have won 13 races from 143 (SR 9.1%); female runners have<br />
won 2 races from 33 (SR 6.1%).</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><a name="0.1_table08"></a></p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="0" width="590">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong><em>Trends analysis:<br />
This is a race that traditionally favours seasonal debutants rather<br />
than horses that have raced recently on the all weather. The best value<br />
has been in the 6/1 to 11/1 price bracket. Prominent racers have a good<br />
recent record, while horses that raced in Listed class LTO have been<br />
the most successful. Avoid horses that raced in an all age handicap<br />
LTO and/or and any horse wearing blinkers or a visor. Also horses that<br />
raced in class 3 or lower LTO look best ignored.</em></strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: small;"><strong>3.40 Doncaster -<br />
Brocklesby – 5f conditions (2yo) </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">POSITIVE TRENDS </span></p>
<p><a name="0.1_table09"></a></p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="0" width="590">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Market: </strong><br />
13 of the last 15 winners came from the top 6 in the betting. (15.4<br />
runners per race is the 15-year average).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Price: </strong><br />
14 of the last 15 winners have been priced 14/1 or lower.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Draw: </strong><br />
In big fields high draws have had the advantage in recent years with<br />
four of the seven 17 runner plus races since 1998 going to one of the<br />
top three stalls. Indeed, 2 years ago the first five runners home were<br />
drawn 19, 14, 13, 18 and 20 (19 ran; 2 non runners). Last year the first<br />
six horses home in a 19 runners race were drawn 11 or higher.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Running style: </strong><br />
The last 15 winners have raced close to or up with the pace.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Trainers: </strong><br />
Bill Turner has saddled 4 winners and 4 placed horses from 15.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">NEGATIVE TRENDS </span></p>
<p><a name="0.1_table0A"></a></p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="0" width="590">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Favourites (inc.<br />
joints): </strong>2 wins from 20 for a loss of £10.25 (ROI -51.3%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Market position: </strong><br />
Horses 10<sup>th</sup> or bigger in the betting market have provided<br />
1 win from 89 runners for a loss of £63.00 (ROI -70.8%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Price: </strong><br />
Horses priced 16/1 or bigger have provided 1 winner from 110 runners<br />
for a loss of £84.00 (ROI -76.4%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Training centre: </strong><br />
Newmarket trainers have provided just 1 winners from 23 for a loss of<br />
£19.75 (ROI -85.9%). </span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;">GENERAL STATS </span></p>
<p><a name="0.1_table0B"></a></p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="0" width="590">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Sex of horse:</strong><br />
Male runners have won 12 races from 170 (SR 4.9%); female runners have<br />
won 3 races from 61 (SR 4.9%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Foaling date: </strong><br />
January and February foals have won 5 races from 79 (SR 6.3%); March<br />
foals have won 6 races from 70 (SR 8.6%); April and May foals have won<br />
4 from 82 (SR 4.9%).</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><a name="0.1_table0C"></a></p>
<div>
<table border="2" cellspacing="0" width="590">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"><strong><em>Trends analysis:<br />
With this being such an early 2yo race one would expect trends to be<br />
thin on the ground, but there are several useful pointers to this contest.<br />
Traditionally it is best to focus on horses priced 14/1 or shorter,<br />
although it should be noted that favourites have struggled. Racing close<br />
to the pace has been vital and this has become more important as the<br />
fields have increased, so ‘in running’ players take note! A trainer<br />
to note is Bill Turner whose record is very impressive. Finally, in<br />
big fields a high draw has been an advantage. </em></strong></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/doncaster-horse-racing-statisics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stratford Horse Racing Tip</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/stratford-horse-racing-tip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/stratford-horse-racing-tip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shareapost</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10yo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chaser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chasers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eskimo Pie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurdle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish Legend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stratford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[STRATFORD 3.00
Alcester Selling Hurdle (CLASS 5) (4yo+)  2m6f110y
4/1 Tabaran, 11/2 Dusty Dane, 11/2 Heraldry, Irish Legend
6/1 Answer  Me, 6/1 Attorney General, 9/1 Triple Bluff
16/1 Little Rort, 25/1 Eskimo Pie,  25/1 Little Blackbeetle
33/1 Brookfieldshector.
* This is a Selling  hurdle over 2m 6.5f
* There has only been 20 similar races
Interesting little race. Only 20 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STRATFORD 3.00</p>
<p>Alcester Selling Hurdle (CLASS 5) (4yo+)  2m6f110y</p>
<p>4/1 Tabaran, 11/2 Dusty Dane, 11/2 Heraldry, Irish Legend<br />
6/1 Answer  Me, 6/1 Attorney General, 9/1 Triple Bluff<br />
16/1 Little Rort, 25/1 Eskimo Pie,  25/1 Little Blackbeetle<br />
33/1 Brookfieldshector.</p>
<p>* This is a Selling  hurdle over 2m 6.5f<br />
* There has only been 20 similar races</p>
<p>Interesting little race. Only 20 similar races but all 20<br />
winners ran  within 10 weeks. HERALDRY has been<br />
absent 122 days and that worries me for a  10yo with<br />
just 2 runs this season. DUSTY DANE has been off<br />
111 days. There  were the odd chasers win like him<br />
but the only one that was exposed had  Grade 1 form<br />
and he doesnt and that absence has to worry for an<br />
exposed  horse. ESKIMO PIE has been off 99 days<br />
and as a horse aged 11 lightly raced  this year he is<br />
not for me. TRIPLE BLUFF has a long absence and<br />
as an  exposed Chaser I couldnt find a similar winner.<br />
LITTLE BLACKBEETLE is too  inexperienced for a<br />
mare. ANSWER ME has just 2 runs this season. I<br />
looked at horses like him from 2m 5f or shorter and<br />
just two runs that  year and found a poor 1-49 record.<br />
LITTLE RORT is rated far lower than most  and has a<br />
horrible task at the weights and should be out of his<br />
depth.  IRISH LEGEND certainly has the ability but I<br />
do have some issues with him. He  comes here from a<br />
Chase and well exposed and these horses have not<br />
been  winning these races. You have to wonder if he<br />
is in form. He has pulled up  twice in a row and his<br />
last run was only 3 weeks ago. TABARAN has a<br />
pretty  solid profile with a recent race and although<br />
he has limitations he should  run his race which is<br />
something not all of these can say.</p>
<p>ATTORNEY  GENERAL</p>
<p>He is exposed and only 3 Exposed horses won in the<br />
20 races.  However they all had Grade 1 form as he does<br />
as well. Exposed horses with  Past Grade 1 form in these<br />
selling races had a 3-4 record and all 3 winners  were 10<br />
and 11 year olds as he is.</p>
<p>* Horses with Grade 1 form  before<br />
* Running within 7 weeks<br />
* Aged 9 or more<br />
* Having run this  season<br />
* 6 horses had that profile in 20 races<br />
* They finished W W W W W  8<br />
* The only loser was an outsider<br />
* Exposed 11 year olds with this  profile were 2-2<br />
* ATTORNEY GENERAL looks interesting statistically</p>
<p>He  is a problem horse and hasnt won in a while<br />
but he is down to bottom grade  with a recent run.<br />
Just 4 months ago he was 2nd at Cheltenham in  a<br />
competetive 0-120 handicap and that form would<br />
be good enough to win  this. He lost his way after<br />
that but last time was a much better run and I  see<br />
him having the best profile in the race</p>
<p>Best Priced 11/2  sportingbet</p>
<p>Guy Ward</p>
<p>To visit Guys site click here ==&gt; <a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk/free-horse-racing-tips.asp">free horse racing tips</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/stratford-horse-racing-tip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saturday Horse Racing Tip</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/saturday-horse-racing-tip-4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/saturday-horse-racing-tip-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shareapost</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Au Courant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Fella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bottom Line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheltenham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cup Handicap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Point Of View]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What This Means]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t think I should have an account bet. Tempted
a lot by the thought of turning an unimpressive week
into a winning one but bottom line is there is not much
point wasting good money before Cheltenham. It has
been a really strong start to the year. I am planning a
Top class Cheltenham where I will be Spot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I should have an account bet. Tempted<br />
a lot by the thought of turning an unimpressive week<br />
into a winning one but bottom line is there is not much<br />
point wasting good money before Cheltenham. It has<br />
been a really strong start to the year. I am planning a<br />
Top class Cheltenham where I will be Spot on. Just<br />
having some small personal bets today for some interest.</p>
<p>For the free blog I will list just one of them.</p>
<p>If interested in the other races covered join the full service<br />
under the Cheltenham Deal</p>
<p>Here is the cheap price link:</p>
<p>*************************************************<br />
<a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk/cheltenham-offer.asp">http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk/cheltenham-offer.asp</a><br />
*************************************************</p>
<p>NEWBURY 3.10</p>
<p>Raymond Mould Supporting Greatwood Gold Cup<br />
Handicap Chase Grade 3 (CLASS 1) (5yo+) 2m4f</p>
<p>3/1 Can´t Buy Time, 7/2 Pasco, 6/1 Battlecry, 8/1 Au Courant, 8/1 Panjo Bere,<br />
9/1 Big Fella Thanks, 10/1 Our Vic10/1 Regal Heights, 33/1 Stan.</p>
<p>* This is a Graded Handicap Chase over 2m4f<br />
* There are 5 renewals of this race<br />
* There has only been 14 similar races elsewhere<br />
* Thats 14 races in Listed or Graded class</p>
<p>The problem here is 14 races like this is not really enough<br />
to get a complete statistical fixture. What this means from<br />
a practicle point of view in this race is whether we can be confident enough to oppose horses with One or Two runs this season. They score badly but over half the runners in this race have just 1-2 runs this season so just how safe it will be to oppose them is open to doubt.<br />
In this particular race all 5 winners had at least 3 runs this season and most had more. In the 14 similar handicaps horses with 1-2 runs that season only had a 1-41 record. If you take horses that  had never run in a Grade 1 or a Grade 2 race before you find that with 1-2-3-4 runs that season had a 0-41 record.</p>
<p>None also had an absence of or more than a month (0-35). That is a problem for CAN´T BUY TIME with just 2 runs in this season and a 9 week break. BIG FELLA THANKS also has no form in Grade 1-2 races and comes out questionably as a horse with just 2 runs this season.<br />
Both AU COURANT and STAN come out badly with an absence and just 2 runs this season. I cant have OUR VIC who drops from 3m 4f just 14 days ago and these statistics show him vulnerable.</p>
<p>* There has been 419 handicap chases between 19f &#8211; 22f<br />
* Thats 419 races at any time of year in Class 2 or better<br />
* Horses from 3m 3f or more last time won just 10 races<br />
* None were aged 11 or more and OUR VIC is 12<br />
* Those running between Febuary and April were 0-71<br />
* Those running within 2 weeks were 0-37</p>
<p>I just see OUR VIC having too much to do. I&#8217;ve found a<br />
winner like REGAL HEIGHTS aged  9 and exposed with<br />
2 runs this year as that winner like him had Grade 1 form<br />
so I see him in a better light but he still looks underraced this year.<br />
If you look at horses in the 14 similar races at this time of year with an<br />
absence of 7 weeks or more there is a very troublesome 1-69 record.<br />
We know that STAN, AU COURANT and CAN´T BUY TIME  have<br />
that against them but so to does PASCO with a 79 day absence.<br />
I see PANJO BERE as having a good profile and although he&#8217;s<br />
not well handicapped he is crucially well raced this year<br />
and looks shortlistable. I also like BATTLECRY a lot. It<br />
has to be considered that Trevor Hemmings has him in<br />
two Cheltenham handicaps and whether that raises the<br />
doubt that this is only a prep race or not I wouldnt know<br />
but He is a talented horse. He was 3rd in the Sun Alliance<br />
Chase a couple of years ago and he comes here as Fitter<br />
in each run he has had this year and probably well treated<br />
as well. Against many horses with absences and many in<br />
the race potentially underraced this year BATTLECRY is<br />
a really generous price for a horse with few obvious flaws.<br />
He is very one paced and could be beaten by something<br />
who can quicken better but he looks rock solid to me and<br />
I will be surprised if he doesnt place.</p>
<p>SELECTION</p>
<p>BATTLECRY Each Way 7/1</p>
<p>* I think BATTLECRY is a place banker<br />
* I think his most likely position is 2nd<br />
* If I was having a saver it would be on Pasco</p>
<p>** Blog comment: Price dropped a touch now<br />
13/2 available at <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=34' title='William Hill' target="_blank">William Hill</a>  <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=30' title='VC' target="_blank">VC</a> <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=53' title='betfred' target="_blank">Betfred</a></p>
<p>Best Wishes</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk">www.mathematician-betting.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/saturday-horse-racing-tip-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weatherbys Champion Bumper</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/weatherbys-champion-bumper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/weatherbys-champion-bumper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheltenham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Dash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lineman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathematician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nightmare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rite Of Passage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Runners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talking Horse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk horse racing tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Willie Mullins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good day yesterday for the blog with a nice 5/1 winner Whicita Lineman
The main message for full members of mathematician betting also picked out 12/1 winner Go Native
and 2/1 winner Quevega
Today on the blog we have a snippet from Guys  main message.
Fingers crossed for another winner today.
WEDNESDAY 5.15
5.15 Weatherbys Champion Bumper (Open NH Flat [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good day yesterday for the blog with a nice 5/1 winner Whicita Lineman</p>
<p>The main message for full members of <a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk">mathematician betting </a>also picked out 12/1 winner Go Native</p>
<p>and 2/1 winner Quevega</p>
<p>Today on the blog we have a snippet from Guys  main message.</p>
<p>Fingers crossed for another winner today.</p>
<p>WEDNESDAY 5.15</p>
<p>5.15 Weatherbys Champion Bumper (Open NH Flat Race) 2m  1/2f</p>
<p>5/1 Rite Of Passage, 5/1 Sicilian Secret, 7/1 Dunguib, 10/1 Quel Esprit, 10/1 Quinola Des Obeaux, 14/1 Gagewell Flyer, 14/1 Shinrock Paddy, 16/1 Cadspeed, 16/1 Meath All Star, 22/1 Henry King, Cranky Corner, 33/1 Morning Supreme, Red Harbour, Some Present,  Bygones Of Brid,<br />
40/1 Lead The Parade,  Long Strand,  Double Dash, 50/1 Latin America, 50/1 Pepe Simo, Lightening Rod, Abroad, 100/1 Benbane Head, Fennis Boy.</p>
<p>The Bumper is always a nightmare  and Willie Mullins is<br />
mob handed again with 9 runners which is ridiculous.  It<br />
seems that 14 of the 24 runners at 33/1 and more are<br />
hard to fancy and  it looks like we have 11 runners at<br />
under 33/1. Ireland have won the last 5  renewals and 7<br />
of the last 8 as well three of which were won by  Willie<br />
Mullins so they clearly dominate.</p>
<p>Statistically you want a horse that has won in a big field. The last 11 winners had all done that and had all won in fields of 16-24-15-27-28-24-17-19-20-22-17 runners. I would want a horse that won it a field of at least 13 runners. Thats quite interesting as SICILIAN SECRET has won in a 7 runner field only and he is the big talking horse. I would also take out all the English runners that dont come from Grade 1 tracks. I would  be against all the English runners that ran once. All 26 horses that had previously ran in a Grade 1 or Grade 2 Bumper lost in this race so I would rule these out as well. I would demand a horse that won last time out. I would be opposing horses that ran within the previous fortnight. I would rather not have a 4 year old. I&#8217;d oppose all horses aged 6 that had under 3 career starts. We are still left with 8 horses after going through all those angles. I would ignore horses that lost more races than they won. I&#8217;m taking<br />
out the  French Bred horses as none have yet won or placed<br />
in the race. I would ignore all horses that are 40/1 and over on the <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=66' title='Exchange' target="_blank">Exchange</a>s. This leaves a shortlist of 3 runners. I will name the shortlist but to take it any further I would have to manufacture some unsafe trend or take a wild guess but my 3  &#8220;Best profiles&#8221; are these</p>
<p>GAGEWELL FLYER -RITE OF PASSAGE -SHINROCK PADDY</p>
<p>SELECTION</p>
<p>RITE OF PASSAGE Each Way</p>
<p>Two interesting and conflicting things about this selection. Dermot Weld won a Cheltenham race in the late 1980&#8217;s. Since 1990 Weld has a 0-49 record at the Festival and that included several beaten favourites. You can argue<br />
that a trend like that  makes him a negative and it will<br />
excite all the &#8220;Trainer Trends&#8221; punters but  I dont see it<br />
like that. This trainer is one of the best trainers in  the<br />
World. He will be more determined than ever to win a<br />
race again here.  The other interesting thing about the<br />
trainer and his horse is this. Reading  in the Irish Press<br />
(as you do) about the race a few days ago I came accros<br />
a storythat interested me.</p>
<p>Dermot Weld was at the races some weeks  ago and he<br />
went up to Willie Mullin&#8217;s Mother &#8211; and duly told her<br />
that  whatever Willie Mullins runs in the Cheltenham<br />
Bumper he would beat him with  RITE OF PASSAGE whom he fancied big time. Thats the bet for me</p>
<p>SELECTION  &#8211; RITE OF PASSAGE EACH WAY 5/1</p>
<p>Blog Comment &#8211; The Odds have now dropped slightly since this was advised to full members earlier today.</p>
<p>Best price now 7/2 in many places <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=42' title='PaddyPower' target="_blank">PaddyPower</a>, <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=31' title='CanBet' target="_blank">CanBet</a>, <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=38' title='Tote' target="_blank">Tote</a> , <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=33' title='Ladbrokes' target="_blank">Ladbrokes</a> etc</p>
<p>Analysis provided by Guy Ward</p>
<p>To visit Guys site click here === &gt; <a href="http://www.mathematician-betting.co.uk">uk Horse Racing Tips</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/weatherbys-champion-bumper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saturday Racing Bets from RacingTrends.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/saturday-racing-bets-from-racingtrendscouk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/saturday-racing-bets-from-racingtrendscouk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 12:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sports Betting Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5 Year Olds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ascot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boyle Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheltenham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exeter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grade 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gustavo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse Bets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse Racing Bets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Boyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negative Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sporting Bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stan James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tingle Creek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Hill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saturday Horse Racing Bets From www.RacingTrends.co.uk
Gustavo (1.25 Sandown) – 
best price 33/1 (sporting bet / Skybet) – EACH WAY
Approved Force (3.05 Sandown)
 – take 22/1 best odds guaranteed atWilliam Hill – EACH WAY
Diriculous (3.30 Great Leighs) 
- take 2/1 best odds guaranteed at William Hill / Stan James / Boyle Sports &#8211; WIN
Saturday Racing
First some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Saturday Horse Racing Bets From <a href="http://www.RacingTrends.co.uk">www.RacingTrends.co.uk</a></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><strong>Gustavo </strong>(1.25 Sandown) – </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">best price 33/1 (sporting bet / <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=49' title='Sky' target="_blank">Sky</a>bet) – EACH WAY</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Approved Force </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt;">(3.05 Sandown)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> – take 22/1 best odds guaranteed at<a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=34' title='William Hill' target="_blank">William Hill</a> – EACH WAY</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Diriculous </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt;">(3.30 Great Leighs) </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">- take 2/1 best odds guaranteed at <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=34' title='William Hill' target="_blank">William Hill</a> / <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=43' title='stan james' target="_blank">Stan James</a> / Boyle Sports &#8211; WIN</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Saturday Racing</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">First some trends – 15 years worth</span></p>
<p>2.35 Sandown &#8211; Tingle Creek Chase – 2 miles (Grade 1)</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">POSITIVE TRENDS</span></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Market:<br />
12 of the last 15 winners have come from the top three in the betting.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Price:<br />
9 of the last 15 winners were priced 7/2 or shorter.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Position<br />
LTO: Horses that won LTO have provided 8 of the last 15 winners.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Seasonal<br />
debutants: Horses making their seasonal debuts have a good record with<br />
7 wins from 25 qualifiers. Backing all qualifiers would have produced<br />
a £8.50 profit (ROI +34%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Market<br />
position LTO: Horses that were first or second favourites last time<br />
out have provided 13 winners of the 15 winners.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">LTO<br />
course: Horses that raced at Exeter last time out have a good record<br />
with 4 of the 17 qualifiers going onto win this race. Backing all qualifiers<br />
would have yielded a £5.83 profit (+34.3%). </span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">NEGATIVE TRENDS</span></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Market:<br />
Horses ranked fifth or higher in the betting have provided just 1 winner<br />
from 40 qualifiers for a loss of £33.00 (ROI -82.5%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Price:<br />
Horses priced 8/1 or bigger have recorded no wins from 44 qualifiers.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Position<br />
LTO: Horses that finished 3<sup>rd</sup> or worse last time out (and<br />
completed the course) have produced just 2 winners from 34 qualifiers<br />
for a loss of £22.50 (ROI -66.2%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">LTO<br />
course: Horses that raced at Cheltenham or Ascot last time out have<br />
a surprisingly poor record with only 3 wins from 37 qualifiers for a<br />
loss of £25.67 (ROI -69.4%).</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">GENERAL STATS</span></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Favourites<br />
(inc. joints): There have been 6 winning favourites (including joints)<br />
from 16 for a small loss of 82 pence.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Age:<br />
5 year olds have won 3 races from 8 qualifiers (SR 37.5%); 6 year olds<br />
have won 2 races from 13 qualifiers (SR 15.4%); 7 year olds have won<br />
5 races from 23 qualifiers (SR 21.7%); 8 year olds have won 3 races<br />
from 23 qualifiers (SR 13%); 9 year olds and older have won 2 races<br />
from 33 qualifiers (SR 6.1%).</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Trends analysis: favourites<br />
have a fairly good record, but it looks best to concentrate on the top three<br />
in the betting as they have provided 80% of the winners. Indeed focusing on<br />
horses priced 15/2 or shorter has provided every single winner in the last 15<br />
years. From there, pay special attention to horses either making their seasonal<br />
debuts, and/or those who were first or second in the betting on their most recent<br />
start. Moving onto negatives, if they raced at Cheltenham or Ascot last time<br />
out this then there is almost certainly value looking elsewhere, as is there<br />
looking for horses that finished 3<sup>rd</sup> or worse LTO (having completed<br />
course). This process should pinpoint a clear trends pick. In terms of age,<br />
5 years have a good record from a small number of runners, while 9 year olds<br />
or older look poor value.</span></em></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Conclusion – Master Minded<br />
has a good trends profile; slightly better than second favourite TidalBay, but<br />
TidalBay looks the value price of the pair to me.</span></p>
<p>3.05 Sandown – Listed handicap hurdle 2 miles ½f</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">POSITIVE TRENDS</span></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Market:<br />
Second, third and fourth favourites have won 7 races from 49 qualifiers<br />
for a profit of £11.50 (ROI +23.5%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Position<br />
LTO: 10 of the last 15 winners won last time out. Backing all qualifiers<br />
would have produced a profit of £13.33 (ROI +20.2%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Weight<br />
carried: The bottom five in the weights (inc. joints) have a good record<br />
with 10 wins from 82 qualifiers. Backing all qualifiers would have yielded<br />
a profit of £23.50 (ROI +28.7%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Racing<br />
Post Speed ratings: Topspeed in the Racing Post has had 5 top rated<br />
/ joint top rated winners for a profit of £29.25 (ROI +162.5%).</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">NEGATIVE TRENDS</span></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Favourites:<br />
There have been 3 winning favourites from 15 qualifiers for a loss of<br />
£8.17 (ROI -57.5%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Price:<br />
Horses priced 20/1 or bigger have provided just 1 winner from 88 qualifiers<br />
for a loss of £62.00 (ROI -70.5%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Weight<br />
carried: The top five in the weights have a poor record with only 2<br />
wins from 73 qualifiers and a loss of £69.67 (ROI -88.2%). </span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Days<br />
since last run: Horses that have been off the track for 7 weeks or more<br />
have produced 0 winners from 35 qualifiers.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Beaten<br />
favourites: 25 beaten favourites have run in this race and all have<br />
lost.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">GENERAL STATS</span></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Age:<br />
4 year olds have won 5 races from 49 qualifiers (SR 10.2%); 5 year olds<br />
have won 5 races from 74 qualifiers (SR 6.8%); 6 year olds have won<br />
4 races from 51 qualifiers (SR 7.8%); 7 year olds plus have won 1 race<br />
from 45 qualifiers (SR 2.2%).</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Trends analysis: favourites<br />
have a poor record which is no surprise considering the race usually attracts<br />
a big field and hence is a competitive affair. Having said that outsiders have<br />
a poor record also, so it seems best to focus on horses priced under 20/1. The<br />
bottom five in the weights have won 67% of the races from just 37% of the runners,<br />
so these horses merit close scrutiny, as do horses won last time out. Horses<br />
to avoid seem to be horses at the top of the weights, beaten favourites last<br />
time out, 7 year olds and older, and horses that have been off the track for<br />
7 or more weeks.</span></em></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Conclusion – from a trends<br />
perspective Spear Thistle looks the one to be on.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">At an each way price Approved<br />
Force looks interesting. Had good form as 3yo and he looks overpriced. <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=34' title='Hills' target="_blank">Hills</a><br />
offer best odds guaranteed at 22/1 and that rates good each way value.</span></p>
<p>2.00 Sandown &#8211; Henry VIII Novices’ Chase – 2 miles (Grade<br />
2)</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">POSITIVE TRENDS</span></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Favourites<br />
(inc. joints): There have been 10 winning favourites (including joints)<br />
from 17 qualifiers for a profit of £4.81 (ROI +28.3%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Market:<br />
14 of the last 15 winners have come from the top two in the betting.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Price:<br />
14 of the last 15 winners were priced 7/2 or shorter.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">LTO<br />
winners: 10 of the last 15 winners won last time out.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Recent<br />
form: 23 horses have come into the race having finished first or second<br />
on all of their last three starts and 8 have won.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Jumping:<br />
All 15 winners came into the race having never fallen / unseated previously<br />
in their careers.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">LTO<br />
course: Horses that raced at Cheltenham last time out have a good record<br />
with 6 of the 20 qualifiers going onto win this race.</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">NEGATIVE TRENDS</span></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Market:<br />
Horses third or bigger in the betting have provided just 1 winner from<br />
50 qualifiers for a loss of £43.00 (ROI – 86%).</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Price:<br />
Horses priced 8/1 or bigger have recorded no wins from 27 qualifiers.</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Course<br />
winners: Course winners have only won once from 15 runners for a loss<br />
of £12.62 (ROI -84.1%).</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">GENERAL STATS</span></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="590" valign="top"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Age:<br />
4 and 5 year olds have won 5 races from 22 qualifiers (SR 22.7%); 6<br />
year olds have won 7 races from 33 qualifiers (SR 21.2%); 7 year olds<br />
plus have won 3 races from 22 qualifiers (SR 13.6%). </span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Trends analysis: the top<br />
two in the market have dominated this event winning a all bar one of the races,<br />
with favourites doing especially well winning 67% of them. From here you need<br />
to focus on good jumpers as none of the winners had previous fallen in their<br />
careers. Last time out winners have a good record, while horses that ran at<br />
Cheltenham last time out have a good record also.</span></em></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Conclusion – of the front<br />
two in the market, second favourite Araldur has the better profile and at 7/2<br />
looks better value.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" align="center"><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt;">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">1.25 Sandown – this is an<br />
open handicap hurdle but one horse stands out for me at the early prices. Gustavo<br />
hails from a stable that seems to be running into form and he has plenty of<br />
other positives as well. He has a good record fresh, has a good record on right<br />
handed tracks (4 wins, 2 placed from 8 ) and acts on the ground. The jockey<br />
looks a potential negative but he has an 18% strike rate for Venetia Williams<br />
so perhaps that is not a worry. At 33/1 best price at sporting bet and <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=49' title='Sky' target="_blank">Sky</a> bet<br />
/ mid 40s on <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=66' title='Betfair' target="_blank">Betfair</a> he looks a worthwhile punt. If you don’t have an account<br />
with sporting bet / <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=49' title='Sky' target="_blank">Sky</a> bet then take the best odds guaranteed at either bet<br />
365 or <a href='http://www.free-bet.co.uk/clickthru.asp?id=34' title='William Hill' target="_blank">William Hill</a> (both price up at 25/1).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">3.30 Great Leighs – Diriculous<br />
looks a solid favourite and 2/1 looks a fair bet to me.</span></p>
<p>This message was provided by Dave Renham of <a href="http://www.RacingTrends.co.uk">www.RacingTrends.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sports-betting-blog.co.uk/saturday-racing-bets-from-racingtrendscouk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

